•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A02879 Summary:

BILL NOA02879
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORMagnarelli
 
COSPNSRButtenschon, Stirpe, Paulin, Glick, Sayegh, Jacobson, Colton, Zebrowski, Epstein, Aubry, Hyndman, Gunther, Levenberg, Sillitti, Hevesi, Simon, Reyes, Eachus, Bores
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §6349, CPLR
 
Authorizes a supreme court judge hearing a petition for an "extreme risk protection order" to also hear a petition for a regular order of protection pursuant to the criminal procedure law, the domestic relations law and/or the family court act.
Go to top    

A02879 Actions:

BILL NOA02879
 
01/31/2023referred to codes
01/03/2024referred to codes
Go to top

A02879 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A2879
 
SPONSOR: Magnarelli
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the issuance of additional orders of protection   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To authorize judges reviewing petitions for extreme risk prevention orders to issue additional orders of protection if needed.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1: Adds new § 6349 to the Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR") to authorize judges reviewing a request for an extreme risk prevention order to consider additional petitions for orders of protection in the same proceeding. Section 2: Establishes the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of Article 63-A "Red Flag Law" of the CPLR was important step in combating gun violence in New York State. Allowing persons to seek an "extreme risk protection order" to remove firearms from the possession of someone who is an imminent risk to themselves and others will save lives. However, this statute does authorize the Supreme Court judge hearing the petition to issue a regular order of protection in the same proceeding. If an order of protection is needed, a separate proceeding must be initiated in Family or Criminal Court. Allowing the judge reviewing a Red Flag petition to also issue additional orders of protection will help ensure that persons under potential threat are protected without delay.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:. New Bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.
Go to top

A02879 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          2879
 
                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 31, 2023
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  MAGNARELLI  -- read once and referred to the
          Committee on Codes
 
        AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules,  in  relation  to  the
          issuance of additional orders of protection
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
     2  section 6349 to read as follows:
     3    § 6349. Issuing additional orders of  protection.  When  reviewing  an
     4  extreme risk protection order or temporary extreme risk protection order
     5  petition  under  this  article, the court may also consider any applica-
     6  tions for an order of protection brought by the petitioner in  the  same
     7  proceeding  under the criminal procedure law, the domestic relations law
     8  and/or the family  court  act.    If  the  court  finds  such  an  order
     9  warranted,  it may issue an order of protection pursuant to the criminal
    10  procedure law, the domestic relations law or the family court act.
    11    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
 

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD02493-01-3
Go to top