•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 

A10712 Summary:

BILL NOA10712
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORWalker
 
COSPNSRBarron, Blake, Robinson, Jean-Pierre, Bichotte, Hyndman, Mosley, Gantt, Cusick, Kavanagh, Richardson, Lifton, Cook, Sepulveda, Hooper, Ramos, Peoples-Stokes, Perry, Harris
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd Art 8 Title VI §8-600, El L
 
Relates to pre-clearance of voting-related regulations and policies.
Go to top

A10712 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A10712
 
SPONSOR: Rules (Walker)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the election law, in relation to pre- clearance of voting-related regulations and policies   PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to ensure that the right of citizens to vote is not denied on account of race, color or language.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill adds a new § 8-600 to the election law to estab- lish a pre clearance process wherein the implementation of any changes relating qualifications for voting, pre-requisites to voting or any regulations, policies, practices, or procedures with regard to voting in a county in which at least 10% of the population consists of a protected class, or in a county which has been the subject of an action related to discriminatory practice in the preceding 10 years, or in a county that was previously subject to the pre clearance process under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, must first be submitted to the Attorney General for review and approval.   JUSTIFICATION: In June 2013, the U.S Supreme Court, in Shelby County v. Holder held that it is unconstitutional to use the coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act to determine which jurisdictions are subject to the preclearance requirement of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of Section 5 itself. The effect of the Shelby County decision is that the jurisdictions iden- tified by the coverage formula in Section 4(b) no longer need to seek preclearance for the new voting changes. Section 5 of the Voting rights Act was enacted to stop changes in election practices or procedures in covered jurisdictions until the new procedures have been determined, either after administrative review by the Attorney General, or after a lawsuit before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, to have neither a discrimi- natory purpose nor effect. Section 5 was designed to ensure that voting changes in covered jurisdictions could not be implemented until a deter- mination had been obtained. In order to protect and ensure the rights of all voters and prevent the establishment or implementation of discriminatory practices, this bill would establish a "pre-clearance" process in which NYS counties meeting specific criteria would have to clear requested voting policy changes with the NYS Attorney General prior to implementation.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New Bill   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: 180 days after enactment.
Go to top