•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A01903 Summary:

BILL NOA01903
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORFahy
 
COSPNSRLentol, Aubry, McDonald, Steck, Gottfried, Magnarelli, Crespo, Sepulveda, Arroyo, Simotas, Magee, Colton, Crouch, Montesano, Raia, Rosenthal L, Woerner, Jenne, Brindisi, Mosley, Palmesano, Bronson, Skoufis, Barclay, Blankenbush, Cahill, Stec, Murray, Barrett, Peoples-Stokes, Butler, Lupardo, Lalor, Pichardo, Rivera, Stirpe, Walker, Jaffee, O'Donnell, Finch, Ramos, Ryan, Hunter, Davila, Rodriguez, Brabenec, Otis, Titus, Perry, Oaks, Mayer, Gunther, Englebright, Weprin, Ortiz, Richardson, Hyndman, Abbate, Buchwald, Zebrowski, Simon, Seawright, Glick, Blake, Cook, Galef, Giglio, Hawley, Hevesi, Hikind, Lifton, Skartados, Wallace, Abinanti
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §722-e, County L; amd §832, Exec L; amd §98-b, St Fin L
 
Requires state reimbursement to counties and cities in which a county is located of the full amount of expenditures for indigent legal services.
Go to top

A01903 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A1903
 
SPONSOR: Fahy
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the county law, the executive law and the state finance law, in relation to indigent defense services   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To ensure that all persons accused of crimes in New York are able to receive effective legal representation whether or not they have the ability to pay for a lawyer by establishing a system of direct state funding at the requisite adequate level to eliminate the geographic disparity in representation.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1: provides legislative findings and declaration. Section 2: amends Section 722-e of the County law to require the State to reimburse, over a seven year four year phase in period, counties and cities in which a county is wholly located the full amount of expenses of counsel services for indigent legal defendants. Section 3: "Subdivision 3 of section 832 of the executive law, as added by section 1 of part E of chapter 56 of the laws of 2010, is amended and a new paragraph (n) is added to read as follows: (n) to adopt, promul- gate, amend or rescind rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this section, including to (i) ensure the presence of counsel at the first appearance of any eligible defendant charged with a crime, (ii)establish caseload/workload regulations for attorneys providing mandated representation, and (iii) improve the quality of mandated representation." Section 4: amends subdivision 3 of section 98-b of the state finance law, as amended by part E of chapter 56 of the laws of 2010. Section 5 is the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: The state has just recently settled a lawsuit with five counties Suffolk, Washington, Ontario, Onondaga, and Schuyler - in which the settlement calls for the Office of Indigent Legal Services to be in charge of the public defense operations in the five counties. This would be the first time in New York that a statewide entity will be responsi- ble for legal representation of all indigent criminal defendants. Coun- ties statewide are currently responsible for funding indigent legal services by federal mandate but adherence is uneven and dependent on a particular county's ability or inability to properly fund the program. Many counties have no system for supervising caseloads or quality, no staffing formula to ensure an appropriate number of public defenders, and no standard ensuring comparable compensation for defenders. My legislation would amend the law to provide for the state to take over full funding of the program in 2024, and relieve all counties of this financial strain. As the Governor noted during the State of Opportunity agenda, local governments have been struggling while the state's finances have generally improved. Now is the time for the state to rein- vest in its counties and relieve the counties of this unfunded mandate.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New Bill   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The bill would be effective April 1, 2018.
Go to top

A01903 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          1903
 
                               2017-2018 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 13, 2017
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by M. of A. FAHY, LENTOL, AUBRY, McDONALD, STECK, GOTTFRIED,
          MAGNARELLI, CRESPO, SEPULVEDA, ARROYO, SIMOTAS, MAGEE, COLTON, CROUCH,
          MONTESANO, RAIA, ROSENTHAL, WOERNER, JENNE, BRINDISI, MOSLEY, PALMESA-
          NO, BRONSON, SKOUFIS,  BARCLAY,  BLANKENBUSH,  CAHILL,  STEC,  MURRAY,
          BARRETT,  PEOPLES-STOKES,  BUTLER,  LUPARDO,  LALOR, PICHARDO, RIVERA,
          STIRPE, WALKER, JAFFEE, O'DONNELL, FINCH, RAMOS, RYAN, HUNTER, DAVILA,
          GRAF, RODRIGUEZ, BRABENEC, OTIS, TITUS, PERRY, OAKS,  MAYER,  GUNTHER,
          ENGLEBRIGHT,  WEPRIN,  KEARNS,  ORTIZ,  RICHARDSON,  HYNDMAN,  ABBATE,
          BUCHWALD, ZEBROWSKI, SIMON,  SEAWRIGHT,  GLICK,  BLAKE,  COOK,  GALEF,
          GIGLIO,  HAWLEY, HEVESI, HIKIND, LIFTON, LOPEZ, SKARTADOS -- read once
          and referred to the Committee on Codes
 
        AN ACT to amend the county law, the executive law and the state  finance
          law, in relation to indigent defense services
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Legislative findings and declaration. It is  a  fundamental
     2  right  of  all persons in the United States to be represented by counsel
     3  in all criminal prosecutions. In the case of Gideon v.  Wainwright,  372
     4  U.S.  335,  the  United States Supreme Court ruled that indigent persons
     5  accused in state felony cases who were unable to afford  counsel  had  a
     6  constitutional right to be defended by an appointed attorney paid by the
     7  state.  Subsequently, the Supreme Court determined that indigent persons
     8  accused of any criminal charge that could result in imprisonment, wheth-
     9  er a felony or misdemeanor, are entitled to counsel at  the  expense  of
    10  the state.
    11    New  York state has chosen to fulfill its obligation to provide repre-
    12  sentation to indigent persons accused of a crime by requiring each coun-
    13  ty outside New York city and New York city to implement and fund a  plan
    14  to  provide such representation. In 2006 the Commission on the Future of
    15  Indigent Legal Services concluded that a system of county  operated  and
    16  funded  indigent  defense  services failed to satisfy the constitutional

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD06723-02-7

        A. 1903                             2
 
     1  obligation to protect the rights of indigent persons accused of a crime.
     2  Such Commission recommended that funding  for  indigent  legal  services
     3  come from the State's general fund rather than from the counties.
     4    New  York state has entered into an agreement to settle a class action
     5  lawsuit that alleged deprivation of the right to counsel in  five  coun-
     6  ties.  The  agreement  acknowledges  that  the  Office of Indigent Legal
     7  Services and the Indigent Legal Services Board are authorized "to  moni-
     8  tor  and  study indigent legal services in the state, to recommend meas-
     9  ures to improve those services, to award grant  monies  to  counties  to
    10  support  their  indigent  representation  capability,  and  to establish
    11  criteria for the distribution  of  such  funds."  While  the  settlement
    12  agreement pertains to only five counties, its criteria establish a stan-
    13  dard for providing indigent legal services that should apply statewide.
    14    The  legislature  finds  and declares that in all criminal proceedings
    15  against people unable to afford counsel, New  York  state  is  constitu-
    16  tionally  required  to  provide public defense services. The legislature
    17  further finds that the state is obligated to  undertake  initiatives  to
    18  improve  the  quality  of  indigent  defense,  ensure  representation at
    19  arraignment, implement caseload  standards  for  providers  of  indigent
    20  legal services, and implement statewide standards for determining eligi-
    21  bility  for  mandated  representation. Mandating counties to finance the
    22  state's obligation to provide indigent legal services imposes a  signif-
    23  icant  uncontrollable  financial  burden  on  counties dependent on real
    24  property taxes to fund needed services, and subject to a  state  imposed
    25  tax cap.
    26    The  legislature  finds  and  declares  that  in  order to fulfill its
    27  constitutional obligation to provide indigent legal services, the  state
    28  shall  pay  counties the full amount necessary to ensure the delivery of
    29  quality legal services for indigent criminal defendants in a  consistent
    30  manner throughout the State.
    31    §  2.  Section 722-e of the county law, as added by chapter 878 of the
    32  laws of 1965, is amended to read as follows:
    33    § 722-e. Expenses. All expenses for  providing  counsel  and  services
    34  other  than counsel hereunder shall be a county charge or in the case of
    35  a county wholly located within a city a city charge to be paid out of an
    36  appropriation for such purposes and shall be reimbursed by the state  to
    37  the  county  or city providing such services, provided, however, that in
    38  the state fiscal year beginning:
    39    (a) April first,  two  thousand  eighteen,  the  state  shall  provide
    40  reimbursement  for  not  less than twenty-five percent of such expenses;
    41  and
    42    (b) April first,  two  thousand  nineteen,  the  state  shall  provide
    43  reimbursement  for  not  less than thirty-five percent of such expenses;
    44  and
    45    (c)  April  first,  two  thousand  twenty,  the  state  shall  provide
    46  reimbursement for not less than forty-five percent of such expenses; and
    47    (d)  April  first,  two  thousand  twenty-one, the state shall provide
    48  reimbursement for not less than fifty-five percent of such expenses; and
    49    (e) April first, two thousand  twenty-two,  the  state  shall  provide
    50  reimbursement for not less than sixty-five percent of such expenses; and
    51    (f)  April  first,  two thousand twenty-three, the state shall provide
    52  reimbursement for not less than seventy-five percent of  such  expenses;
    53  and
    54    (g)  every  year thereafter, the state shall provide reimbursement for
    55  the full amount of such expenses.

        A. 1903                             3

     1    § 3. Subdivision 3 of section 832 of the executive law is  amended  by
     2  adding a new paragraph (n) to read as follows:
     3    (n)  to  adopt,  promulgate, amend or rescind rules and regulations to
     4  carry out the provisions of this section, including to  (i)  ensure  the
     5  presence  of  counsel  at the first appearance of any eligible defendant
     6  charged with a crime, (ii) establish caseload/workload  regulations  for
     7  attorneys providing mandated representation, and (iii) improve the qual-
     8  ity of mandated representation.
     9    §  4.  Subdivision  3  of  section  98-b  of the state finance law, as
    10  amended by section 2 of part E of chapter 56 of the  laws  of  2010,  is
    11  amended to read as follows:
    12    3.  Amounts  distributed  from  such  fund shall be limited to amounts
    13  appropriated therefor and shall be distributed as follows:
    14    (a) The office of court administration may expend  a  portion  of  the
    15  funds available in such fund to provide assigned counsel paid in accord-
    16  ance  with section thirty-five of the judiciary law, up to an annual sum
    17  of twenty-five million dollars.
    18    (b) [An] In addition to the amounts paid to each county and  the  city
    19  of New York pursuant to section seven hundred twenty-two-e of the county
    20  law  and  in accordance with sections eight hundred thirty-two and eight
    21  hundred thirty-three of the executive law an  annual  amount  [of  forty
    22  million  dollars  shall  be  made available to the city of New York from
    23  such fund for the provision of services pursuant to  article  eighteen-B
    24  of  the county law; provided that the city of New York shall continue to
    25  provide at minimum the aggregate amount of funding  for  public  defense
    26  services  including,  but  not  limited  to,  the  amount of funding for
    27  contractors of public defense services and individual defense attorneys,
    28  that it provided, pursuant to  article  eighteen-B  of  the  county  law
    29  during  its  two  thousand  nine--two thousand ten fiscal year] shall be
    30  paid to such counties and city equal to the amount paid from  such  fund
    31  to such counties and city in March two thousand ten.
    32    (c)  [Within the first fifteen days of March two thousand eleven, each
    33  county other than a county wholly contained within the city of New York,
    34  shall receive ninety percent of the amount paid to such county in  March
    35  two  thousand  ten.  Within the first fifteen days of March two thousand
    36  twelve, each county other than a county wholly contained within the city
    37  of New York shall receive seventy-five percent of  the  amount  paid  to
    38  such  county in March two thousand ten. Within the first fifteen days of
    39  March two thousand thirteen, each county  other  than  a  county  wholly
    40  contained within the city of New York shall receive fifty percent of the
    41  amount  paid  to such county in March two thousand ten. Within the first
    42  fifteen days of March two thousand fourteen, each county  other  than  a
    43  county  wholly contained within the city of New York shall receive twen-
    44  ty-five percent of the amount paid to such county in March two  thousand
    45  ten. For all state fiscal years following the two thousand thirteen--two
    46  thousand  fourteen  fiscal  year,  there  shall  be  no  required annual
    47  payments pursuant to this paragraph. Notwithstanding the  provisions  of
    48  this  paragraph, for each of the four required payments made to counties
    49  within the first fifteen days of March two thousand eleven, two thousand
    50  twelve, two thousand thirteen and two thousand  fourteen,  Hamilton  and
    51  Orleans  counties  shall  receive  such percentage payments based on the
    52  amounts that each county would have received in March two  thousand  ten
    53  had  it  satisfied  the  maintenance  of effort requirement set forth in
    54  paragraph (c) of subdivision four of this  section  in  effect  on  such
    55  date.

        A. 1903                             4

     1    (d)]  Remaining  amounts within such fund, after accounting for annual
     2  payments required in paragraphs (a)[,] and (b) [and (c)] of this  subdi-
     3  vision  and  subparagraph  (iii)  of paragraph (a) of subdivision two of
     4  this section shall be distributed  in  accordance  with  sections  eight
     5  hundred thirty-two and eight hundred thirty-three of the executive law.
     6    § 5. This act shall take effect April 1, 2018.
Go to top