A01341 Summary:

BILL NOA01341
 
SAME ASSAME AS S04718
 
SPONSORRosenthal L (MS)
 
COSPNSRPaulin, Gottfried, Dinowitz, Englebright, Ortiz, Steck, Weprin, Colton, Zebrowski
 
MLTSPNSRCusick, Glick, Hevesi, Malliotakis, Montesano, Mosley, Simon, Thiele, Titus
 
Add §353-g, Ag & Mkts L
 
Pertains to confinement of animals for food producing purposes; prohibits any person to tether or confine any pig during pregnancy, calf raised for veal, or egg-laying hen who is kept on a farm for all or the majority of any day in a manner that prevents such animal from lying down, standing up and fully extending its limbs and turning around freely; establishes that commission of such crime shall constitute a class A misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for a period not to exceed one year and/or fine not to exceed $1,000.
Go to top    

A01341 Actions:

BILL NOA01341
 
01/11/2017referred to agriculture
01/03/2018referred to agriculture
Go to top

A01341 Committee Votes:

Go to top

A01341 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

A01341 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A1341
 
SPONSOR: Rosenthal (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to the confinement of animals for food producing purposes   PURPOSE: This bill phases out pig gestation crates, veal crates and hen battery cages.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section one amends the agriculture and markets law by adding a new section 353-e that defines the terms employed for the purposes of this bill. Subdivision two would make it unlawful for any person to confine any covered animal in a manner that prevents them from lying down, standing up and fully extending its limbs and turning around freely. Subdivision three lists exemptions to the rules set forth in the previ- ous subdivision. Subdivision four would make any violation of the provisions of this section a Class A misdemeanor. Subdivision five provides that nothing contained in this section shall conflict with humane local laws. Subdivision six stipulates that nothing in this section shall reduce the protection afforded to animals or the enforcement of such protection. Subdivision five sets out the enforcement mechanism for this section. Section two sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Harsh confinement within confinement crates and cages deprives calves, pigs and chickens of the ability to engage in natural behavior. Animals confined in such circumstances experience extensive and significant physical and psychological trauma. Nationwide, about one million calves raised for veal and six million breeding sows (female pigs) suffer nearly their entire lives inside tiny crates so small the animals cannot turn around. According the Humane Society of the United States, veal factory farmers separate calves from their mothers within the first few days of birth and cram them into individual crates or stalls, tethered by their necks. Inside these enclosures, the calves can barely move. Breeding sows suffer under similar circumstances. Gestation crates board pregnant pigs for nearly their entire four-month pregnancy. These tiny metal crates are not even large enough for the pig to move or perform natural behaviors such as cleaning themselves or simply turning around. Veal and pork producers nationally are already in the process of phasing out veal and gestation crates. All veal producers have set a deadline of 2017 for themselves to phase out veal crates. In January 2007, Smith- field, the nation's largest pork producers, announced that they would phase out the confinement of pigs over the next decade. Cargill, the nation's 8th biggest pork producers, has also stated that they are work- ing on phasing out confinement. The world's largest food-service provid- er, Compass group, is phasing out cage shell eggs for all of its 8,000 U.S. accounts. This announcement followed Bon Appetit's decision to phase out cage eggs for all of its 400 cafes, including major corporate clients such as Yahoo!, Oracle Corporation, Cisco Systems, Adidas, Best Buy, and Nordstrom, Cartwells and Gukenheimer, some of the largest U.S.-owned food service companies, made similar decisions. Other entities such as Ben and Jerry's, AOL, Google, Chicago's Swedish Covenant Hospital and Omni Hotels will not serve battery cage eggs in the food that they provide to workers, clients and guests. More than 350 schools have enacted policies to eliminate or greatly decrease their use of eggs from caged hens. These self-imposed pledges are an excellent first step, but the indus- try's best practices should be embraced across the board. American consumers are increasingly demanding the humane treatment of all animals, including those raised for food. New York State should rise to meet this demand by bringing the practices of its agricultural industry into the modern era. This ban is not without precedent. In 2002, Florida voters banned gestation crates in a 55-45% vote. In 2006, Arizona voters banned both gestation crates and veal crates in a 62-38% vote. In 2007, the Oregon legislature banned gestation crates and in 2008, the Colorado legisla- ture banned both gestation crates and veal crates. California voters recently passed Proposition 2 which banned gestation crates, veal crates and battery cages by a 63.5-36.5% vote. The entire European Union has also banned both veal crates and gestation crates, effective 2007 and 2013, respectively.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2015-16: A.372-A - Referred to Agriculture; S.3999 - Referred to Agri- culture 2013-14: A.424 - Referred to Agriculture 2011-12: A.1928 - Referred to Agriculture 2009-10: A.8163 - Referred to Agriculture   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill shall take effect twenty-four months after it shall have become a law.
Go to top

A01341 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          1341
 
                               2017-2018 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 11, 2017
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. ROSENTHAL, PAULIN, KAVANAGH, GOTTFRIED, DINOWITZ,
          ENGLEBRIGHT,  ORTIZ, STECK, WEPRIN, COLTON -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M.
          of A. CUSICK, GLICK, HEVESI, MALLIOTAKIS, MONTESANO,  MOSLEY,  THIELE,
          TITUS -- read once and referred to the Committee on Agriculture
 
        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  agriculture and markets law, in relation to the
          confinement of animals for food producing purposes
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1. The agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new
     2  section 353-g to read as follows:
     3    § 353-g. Confinement of animals for food producing purposes. 1.    For
     4  purposes  of  this section, the following terms shall have the following
     5  meanings:
     6    (a) "Calf raised for veal" means any calf of the bovine  species  kept
     7  for the purpose of producing the food product described as veal.
     8    (b)  "Covered animals" means any pig during pregnancy, calf raised for
     9  veal, or egg-laying hen who is kept on a farm.
    10    (c) "Egg-laying hen" means any female  domesticated  chicken,  turkey,
    11  duck, goose, or guinea fowl kept for the purpose of egg production.
    12    (d)  "Enclosure"  means any cage, crate, or other structure (including
    13  what is commonly described as a "gestation  crate"  for  pigs,  a  "veal
    14  crate"  for  calves,  or  a  "battery cage" for egg-laying hens) used to
    15  confine a covered animal.
    16    (e) "Farm" means the land, building,  support  facilities,  and  other
    17  equipment   that  are  wholly  or  partially  used  for  the  commercial
    18  production of animals or animal products used for  food  or  fiber,  and
    19  does not include live animal markets.
    20    (f)  "Fully extending its limbs" means fully extending all limbs with-
    21  out touching the side of an enclosure, including, in the  case  of  egg-
    22  laying  hens, fully spreading both wings without touching the side of an
    23  enclosure or other egg-laying hens.
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD04973-01-7

        A. 1341                             2
 
     1    (g) "Person" means any individual, corporation,  partnership,  associ-
     2  ation, or other legal entity.
     3    (h)  "Pig  during  pregnancy"  means  any  pregnant pig of the porcine
     4  species kept for the primary purpose of breeding.
     5    (i) "Turning around freely" means turning in a complete circle without
     6  any impediment, including a tether, and without touching the side of  an
     7  enclosure.
     8    2.  It  shall  be  unlawful  for  any  person to tether or confine any
     9  covered animal, as defined in subdivision one of this section, on a farm
    10  for all or the majority of any day,  in  a  manner  that  prevents  such
    11  animal  from  lying  down, standing up and fully extending its limbs and
    12  turning around freely.
    13    3.  This  section  shall  not  apply  during  the  following  lawfully
    14  performed activities:
    15    (A) Transportation,
    16    (B)  Exhibitions at rodeos, fairs, youth programs, and similar exhibi-
    17  tions,
    18    (C) Slaughtering process,
    19    (D) Scientific or agricultural research,
    20    (E) Examination, testing, individual treatment or operation for veter-
    21  inary purposes,
    22    (F) To a pig during the seven-day period prior to the  pig's  expected
    23  date of giving birth.
    24    4.  A  violation of the provisions of this section is a class A misde-
    25  meanor punishable by imprisonment for a period not to exceed  one  year,
    26  or  by  a  fine not to exceed one thousand dollars, or by both such fine
    27  and imprisonment.
    28    5. Nothing contained in this section shall  prevent  any  town,  city,
    29  village  or  county in New York state from enacting a local law or ordi-
    30  nance to provide for the humane treatment of and prevention  of  cruelty
    31  to farm animals, provided, however, that no such law shall conflict with
    32  the provisions of this section.
    33    6.  Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to reduce the
    34  protection afforded to farm animals under  any  other  section  of  this
    35  article or any other law or regulation. Nothing in this section shall be
    36  construed  to  limit or restrict agents or officers of societies for the
    37  prevention of cruelty to animals or the police from enforcing the  other
    38  provisions  of  this  article or any other law or regulation relating to
    39  the humane treatment of or cruelty to animals.
    40    7. This section shall be enforced by the department, and any agent and
    41  officer of any duly incorporated society for the prevention  of  cruelty
    42  to  animals may issue an appearance ticket pursuant to section 150.20 of
    43  the criminal procedure law, summons or arrest, and bring before a  court
    44  or  magistrate  having jurisdiction, any person offending against any of
    45  the provisions of this section.
    46    § 2. This act shall take effect twenty-four months after it shall have
    47  become a law.
Go to top

A01341 LFIN:

 NO LFIN
Go to top