-  This bill is not active in this session.
 
     
  •  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A01278 Summary:

BILL NOA01278B
 
SAME ASSAME AS S03100-A
 
SPONSORJoyner
 
COSPNSRBores, Burdick, Simon, Ardila, Reyes, Taylor, Gibbs, Lunsford, Walker, Rosenthal L, Wallace, Forrest
 
MLTSPNSRSeawright
 
Add 191-d, Lab L
 
Prohibits non-compete agreements and certain restrictive covenants; authorizes covered individuals to bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against any employer or persons alleged to have violated such prohibition.
Go to top

A01278 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A1278B
 
SPONSOR: Joyner
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the labor law, in relation to prohibiting non-compete agreements and certain restrictive covenants   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To amend the Labor Law regarding the permissible use of non-compete agreements in employment contracts.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 would a new Section 191-d to the Labor Law. The bill would define relevant terms, including "non-compete agreement" and "covered-individual" and provide that no employer or its agent, or the officer or agent of any corporation, partnership, or limited liabil- ity company, shall seek, require, demand or accept a non-compete agree- ment from a covered individual. The bill would void current non-compete agreements and prohibit employ- ers from seeking such agreements, and provide that covered individuals may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against any employer or persons alleged to have violated this section. The bill would provide that such provisions would not affect any other provision of law relating to the ability of the employer to enter into an employment contract or other written agreement that protects specif- ically enumerated legitimate business interests with a prospective or current employee. The bill would apply notwithstanding section 202-k of the labor law affecting broadcasting industry employees, and the provisions of that section would remain in effect in the event that any part of this bill be adjudged as invalid. Section 2 would provide a severability clause. Section 3 would set the effective date.   DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND AMENDED VERSION (IF APPLICABLE): Definitional changes to broaden scope of bill to apply to persons in position of economic dependence. Clarifies that nothing in the section should be interpreted to constrain an employer from entering into agreements relating to the disclosure of trade secrets, proprietary client information, or solicitation of clients. Clarifies that the bill applies to section 202-k of the labor law affecting broadcast industry employees, and that section shall remain in effect should this bill or an part of it be found invalid.   JUSTIFICATION: Non-compete agreements have a negative effect on the labor market and economy of New York State. They prevent workers from seeking employment at entities that may be a better fit, and they provide employers from providing more competitive benefits and wages, because their workforce cannot seek employment elsewhere. In certain industries, they can have a detrimental impact on consumers as well. Non-compete agreements are prevalent in the medical field, where they disrupt continuity of care. Recently, the federal government has announced an interest in banning such agreements nationwide via an FTC regulation. This bill would codify such a ban in state law.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2021-2022: A9591/S6425 - Referred to Labor   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill would take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become law and would be applicable to contracts entered into or modified on or after such effective date.
Go to top