•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A00366 Summary:

BILL NOA00366
 
SAME ASSAME AS S05679
 
SPONSORDavila
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §11-200, El L
 
Authorizes United States citizens currently residing outside the United States whose last residence in the United States was in the state of New York to vote in certain federal elections.
Go to top

A00366 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A366
 
SPONSOR: Davila
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the election law, in relation to authorizing United States citizens currently residing outside the United States whose last residence in the United States was in the state of New York to vote in certain federal elections   PURPOSE OF BILL: This bill would allow voters whose previous residence was in New York State to vote via absentee ballot in a Federal Election if they reside in a United States Territory or United States Possession.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends section 11-200 of the election law by removing the provision that prohibited a citizen who otherwise qualified to vote via absentee ballot from voting if they reside in a United States Territory or Possession. Section 2 sets the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: United States citizens who are former residents of New York may vote in New York as special federal voters via absentee ballot for President, Vice President, for their Congressperson or Senator if they reside outside of the United States. However, the existing statute contains a specific exception if the voter resides in a United States "territory" or "possession", such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, or American Samoa. So, a former eligible New York voter who moves to France can vote via New York absentee ballot in certain federal elections, whereas a former eligible New York voter who moves, for example, to Puerto Rico cannot. This has led to the disenfranchisement of countless New Yorkers - who would otherwise qualify to vote by absentee ballot as they are prevented from exercising their constitutionally protected right to vote in a federal election. This issue is particularly important in New York because New York State has the second-largest Puerto Rican population in the United States, Puerto Ricans have the right to establish residency in New York (or any other state) and obtain the right to vote. If they were to move back to Puerto Rico though, they lose this right to vote in federal elections. In Romeu v. Cohen, 265 F. 3d 118 (2nd Circuit 2001), Judge Pierre N. Leval noted that Congress would have the right to "require states to accept the votes of certain U.S. citizens who are not residents of the.State but reside outside the United States or in other states,(and) I can see no reason why Congress might not also with respect to the presidential election require the State to accept the presidential votes of certain U.S. citizens who are nonresidents of the State residing in the U.S. territories, . . Indeed, even without a congressional mandate, a State would no doubt have the power to pass statutes . . . allowing its former residents now residing in a territory to participate in its federal elections." Romeu v. Cohen, 265 F.3d 118,, 129 (2001). (Emphasis added.) This legislation does precisely what Judge Leval suggested and enfranchises New Yorkers who reside outside of New York that otherwise qualify for an absentee ballot to exercise their right to vote in a federal election, even if they reside in a U.S. "territory" or "possession".   SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: This bill enfranchises likely thousands of people who lived in New York, were eligible to vote, and only lost that right by moving to, for exam- ple, Puerto Rico where they would not otherwise be able to vote in federal elections. This bill would address a significant racial and social inequity by which a former NYer who moves to France or England could still vote, while one who moves to Puerto Rico could not.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A. 2819 of the 2023/24 Legislative Session   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act will take effect immediately.
Go to top