•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A00673 Summary:

BILL NOA00673A
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00329-A
 
SPONSORCruz
 
COSPNSRBores, Rosenthal, Kelles, Jackson
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd 710.70, CP L
 
Relates to facilitating appellate review of rulings that implicate issues of public concern.
Go to top

A00673 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A673A
 
SPONSOR: Cruz
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to facilitating appellate review of rulings that implicate issues of public concern   PURPOSE: The purpose of the Act is to require the court to review a denial of a motion to suppress evidence on appeal. By ensuring that a court review such denials, the legislative intent of section 710.70 will be fulfilled, and defendants can properly challenge the validity of an order denying their motion. Additionally, such review of an order deny- ing a motion to suppress evidence will take place regard less of whether a defendant waives their right to appeal on that issue.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section (1) amends CPL 710.70 by replacing the term "may" with "shall" and allows an appellate review of an order finally denying a motion to suppress evidence, regardless of a defendant's waiver of their right to appeal. Section (2) provides that this act will take effect sixty days after becoming law.   JUSTIFICATION: The purpose of the proposed amendment is to fulfill the legislative intent of section 710.70. Currently, the law has recently evolved to curtail a defendant's right to appellate review. Defendants in criminal proceedings traditionally face additional hardships which impact impor- tant constitutional rights involving due process, equal protection and the right to be free from i searches and seizures which occur in cases involving false confessions, unreliable Identification procedures, stops and frisks, racial profiling, and police perjury. This amendment will not change the long established rules of preservation for appellate review. By providing defendants with an additional level of review on crucial orders regarding the suppression of evidence, the constitutional rights of all. New Yorkers can be enforced as it was previously done for decades without causing an undue burden on the courts.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become law.
Go to top