•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A01248 Summary:

BILL NOA01248
 
SAME ASSAME AS S03331
 
SPONSORPaulin
 
COSPNSRWoerner, Lavine, Dickens
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §79-c, ren §79-d to be §79-e, add §79-d, ABC L
 
Provides for certain limited direct interstate shipments by retail licensees to sell wine for off-premises consumption.
Go to top

A01248 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A1248
 
SPONSOR: Paulin
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the alcoholic beverage control law, in relation to providing for certain limited direct interstate shipments of wine for off-premises consumption   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To allow out-of-state wine retailers to ship wine to New York customers, so long as the retailer obtains an out-of-state shipper's license.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section one amends the heading of section 79-c of the alcoholic beverage control law. Section two adds a new section 79-d to the alcoholic beverage control law to allow out-of-state retailers to ship wine to New York customers, so long as the retailer first obtains an out-of-state shipper's license. Section three provides the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: In June of 2019, the Supreme Court ruling in Tennessee Wine v. Thomas declared a Tennessee state law imposing durational residency require- ments on persons and companies wishing to operate retail liquor stores in the state unconstitutional. The law was found to have violated the dormant Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which provides that any state law discriminating against out-of-state goods or nonresident economic actors may be sustained only upon a showing that it is narrowly tailored to advance a legitimate purpose. Essentially, a law may not plainly favor residents over non-residents, absent a legitimate purpose. In its analysis, the Court maintained that the non-discrimination prin- ciples that it had previously tackled with respect to manufacturers also apply to retailers, meaning states may not enact laws that strictly promote instate interests while discriminating against out-of-state actors. Currently, New York State consumers are not authorized to receive wine shipments from out-of-state retailers. This legislation will allow out- of-state retailers to ship wine to New York customers, so long as they first obtain an out-of-state shipper's permit. The current system in our state which prevents New Yorkers from receiving wine shipments from out-of-state retailers is in contrast with the protectionism schemes the Court in Tennessee Wine invalidated. Furthermore, a change to our law is critical if New York is to influence other states to change their laws to also allow for out-of-state ship- ments to come into their states. This bill will help to further legiti- mize a national marketplace for wine shipping. It will also bring in needed tax revenue to our state. Out-of-state retailers who go through the proper channels provided for in this bill to obtain a permit should be able to ship wine to New York customers without discrimination.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A.799, 2021 and 2022, referred to economic development. Same as S.7740 of 2022, referred to commerce. A.8899, 2019 and 2020, referred to economic development.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Increased tax revenue to the state.
Go to top