•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A02140 Summary:

BILL NOA02140B
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00705-B
 
SPONSORJackson
 
COSPNSRLasher, Epstein, Gonzalez-Rojas, Simon, Simone, Meeks, Dinowitz, Cruz, Bores, Rosenthal, Kelles, Steck, Forrest, Burroughs, Glick, Tapia, Pheffer Amato, Bichotte Hermelyn, Torres, Kassay, Lavine, Gallagher, Yeger, Carroll R, Raga, Taylor, Wieder, Valdez, Levenberg, Shimsky, Zinerman, De Los Santos, Burdick, Wright, Dilan, Rajkumar, Hooks, Septimo, Carroll P, Colton, Rozic, Hevesi, Lee, Cunningham, Shrestha, Moreno, Clark, O'Pharrow, Anderson, McDonald, Stirpe
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Ren §2830 to be §2833, add §2834, amd §4406-c, Pub Health L; amd §§3217-b, 3221, 4325, 4413, 3231 & 4308, add §§4242 & 4715, Ins L
 
Relates to fair pricing for low-complexity, routine medical care to more closely align payment rates across ambulatory settings for selected services that are safe and appropriate to provide in all settings.
Go to top

A02140 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A2140B
 
SPONSOR: Jackson
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the public health law, in relation to fair pricing for low-complexity, routine medical care; and to amend the insurance law, in relation to billing and reimbursement   PURPOSE: To enact site neutral payment policy for certain healthcare services in New York State. To ensure that routine outpatient services do not cost New Yorkers arbitrarily high prices as a result of hospital market power or consolidation in healthcare. To effect benchmark-based price caps that bring the highest costs down to align with prices found in doctors' offices.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1: Amends the public health law by adding a new section 2832 Subdivision 1: Establishes various definitions related to applicable services, health benefit plans, plan sponsors, health care contracts, what shall and shall not be considered a health care provider, affil- iated providers, health insurance carriers, health systems, participat- ing providers, site-neutral payment policies, superintendent and third- party administrators. Subdivision 2: Dictates the maximum rate for health care providers that enter healthcare contracts for applicable.services to be the lessor of 150% of the Medicare rate or the negotiated rate. Subdivision 3: Requires that certain provisions be included in health care contracts. Subdivision 4: Requires that the department collect and compile all available and relevant hospital, health system, and payer-reported data. Such information shall be published on a publicly accessible website Subdivision 5: Requires that each health insurance carrier submit an annual report to DFS concerning rates for applicable services. DFS and DOH shall submit a report to the Governor, and legislative houses summa- rizing certain information about rates and spending trends. Subdivision 6: Creates a penalty structure and enforcement and oversight powers for DFS, DOH, and the Attorney General. Subdivision 7: Provides that DFS and DOH shall have the ability to promulgate additional regulations or add to the list of applicable services if designated by the Federal Government through the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Regulations and additional codes shall follow the existing procedures for rulemaking. Section 2: Severability. Section 3: Immediate effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Across the nation and in New York State, high hospital prices are driv- ing unsustainable increases in healthcare costs. These cost increases threaten affordability for New Yorkers and squeeze worker wages. While hospital spending increased by 97% from 2007 to 2020, average hourly wages only increased 15% in that same period. These steadily increasing amounts New Yorkers are paying for healthcare are not yielding more care or better health outcomes in return. Instead, high prices are reflective of hospital market power and consolidation. With almost 60% of doctors' offices now owned by hospitals or corpo- rations, there has been an outsized growth in healthcare costs associ- ated with outpatient services that were traditionally performed in a doctor's office but are now being charged at higher hospital level pric- es. Essentially, the service and the quality of care are the same, but patients are paying more, in some cases just because a hospital owns the building. Site neutral payment policy aims to reduce unnecessary and inflated healthcare costs by equalizing the payment rate across "sites" of service (hospital outpatient departments, doctors' offices, ambulatory surgical centers, and other outpatient settings). Site neutral payment policy was initiated as part of the Medicare program, which set site- neutral payments for routine evaluation and management (E&M) services, such as a 15-minute wellness visit. Recent federal initiatives have sought to expand site neutral payment policy. The Fair Pricing Act is based on applying site neutral payment policy to a limited number of medical services that are appropriately delivered in the lower-cost site, which is an outpatient setting, including a doctor's office or ambulatory surgical center, depending on the service. Hospital outpatient departments are generally higher-priced. The services covered under the Fair Pricing Act are the same that Medicare's Payment Advisory Commission (Med PAC) has determined are safe and effec- tive to perform in a doctor's office or other outpatient setting, and which had primarily been performed in doctors' offices prior to recent consolidation trends. Examples of such services include clinic visits, gynecological procedures like a pap-smear, certain skin procedures, such as laser treatments; drug administration procedures such as vaccines or infusion drug administration; and imaging procedures, such as X-Rays, ultrasounds, EKGs and MRIs. The site-neutral payment policy applies to all patients and programs except those paid for by Medicare, which sets its own rates at the federal level. The site-neutral payment policy will not apply to Feder- ally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), public hospitals, federally designated critical access hospitals, federally designated sole communi- ty hospitals, rural emergency hospitals, and safety net hospitals, which are exempt. The Fair Pricing Act offers a unique and much needed remedy for New Yorkers' continuously rising healthcare costs by capping prices for routine services at 150% of Medicare in order to lower health bene- fit expenses for payers and make healthcare more affordable for patients. This price cap level is set above the average prices charged by doctors' offices for the applicable services but below high hospital price levels for the applicable services, thus aiming to bring payment levels in other sites of service closer in line with doctors' office rates. By placing guardrails on healthcare pricing for routine services, regardless of where these medical services are provided, New York State can interrupt consolidation and corporatization incentives in health- care; protect patients - both insured and uninsured - from excessive and arbitrary prices; and promote a fair and affordable economy for taxpay- ers, employers, and workers alike. Site-based price differences for the applicable services are estimated to cost New Yorkers $1.07 billion in annual healthcare overpayments. While specific savings estimates for the bill are to be determined, this bill will help to reduce health care costs for individuals, employers, and the state.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2024- S.9952 New Bill   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Costs are to be determined   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately
Go to top