•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A02398 Summary:

BILL NOA02398
 
SAME ASSAME AS S01814
 
SPONSORGallagher
 
COSPNSRRosenthal, Simon, Stirpe, Brown K
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §35, Judy L; amd §§32.05 & 32.09, Ment Hyg L; amd §§3302, 3331, 3350, 3351 & 3372, Art 33 Title V Title Head, Pub Health L; amd §396-h, County L; amd §121, Gen City L
 
Replaces the words addict or addicts with the words person with substance use disorder or a variation thereof.
Go to top

A02398 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A2398
 
SPONSOR: Gallagher
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the judiciary law, the mental hygiene law, the public health law, the county law, and the general city law, in relation to replacing the words addict and addicts with the words person with substance use disorder or variation thereof   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:: The purpose of this bill is to replace the word "addict" and "addicts" with modern and humane language.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:: Sections one through four and six through twelve replace the word "addict" and "narcotic addict" with "person with substance use disorder" and variations thereof. Section five modifies the definition of the term "addict" in statute and replaces the term "addict" with "person with substance use disorder." Section thirteen is the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: The harsh and pejorative term "addict" was entered into New York's laws in 1972 to refer to people suffering primarily from opioid use disorder as an epidemic of heroin dependence swept through poor communities across the United States. In 1973, a year later, the Rockefeller Drug Laws would be enacted, creating a minimum sentence of 15 years to life in prison for possession of two ounces or more of opiates. Richard Nixon was president and had declared a counterproductive and punitive "war on drugs." As a former Nixon aide said, "We knew we couldn't make it ille- gal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did." Instead of recognizing that opioid use disorder was a public health crisis, New York's legislators and elected leaders at that time chose the same path: vilifying substance use disorder, associating it with moral degeneracy, and enact- ing harsh laws to punish people suffering from addic tion. Since then, the public understanding of substance use disorder has evolved. While we also pursue legislation to provide medical resources and assistance to people suffering from substance use disorder, fight pharmaceutical corporations that profit from manufacturing addiction to opiates, and eliminate the harsh criminal penalties for people suffering from substance use disorder, we should also update the outdated and punitive terminology of our laws.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:: A896 (2023) - died in committee. A8896 (2022) - died in committee.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill is effective immediately.
Go to top