•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A03203 Summary:

BILL NOA03203
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORRosenthal
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §5, Emerg Ten Prot Act of 1974
 
Relates to limited profit housing companies.
Go to top

A03203 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A3203
 
SPONSOR: Rosenthal
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seven- ty-four, in relation to limited-profit housing companies and other buildings or structures which received project-based rental assistance   PURPOSE: This bill protects those tenants who reside in Mitchell-Lama and project-based Section 8 buildings who owners have bought out of the Mitchell-Lama program or who no longer have Section 6 contracts with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section one sets forth the legislative findings and declaration of emer- gency. Section two amends Section 5 of section 4 of Chapter 576 of the laws of 1974 constituting the emergency tenant protection act of 1974 by adding a new subdivision c to set rents for buildings completed after January 1, 1974 as the rents charged on January 1, 2007, as subsequently adjusted by rent regulation laws, Furthermore, this section clarifies that the rent setting language with a base date of January 1, 2007, will supersede any agreement made between a tenant and landlord whether in a lease or another agreement. Section three makes clear that "unique or "peculiar" circumstances rent increases authorized by the New York City rent stabilization law and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act are not applicable to Mitchell-Lama or project-based Section 8 buildings whether the buildings were completed before or after January 1, 1974. Section four provides that in a city having a population of one million or more, that the New York City rent law may be amended by local law or ordinance to provide for the regulation of rents and evictions and the enforcement of such rent stabilization law with regard to housing accom- modations made subject to such law by a declaration of emergency made pursuant to this act. Section five sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Many limited profit housing companies are exercising their option to buy-out of the Mitchell-Lama Program. Likewise, HUD contracts with the owners of rental buildings for Section 8 assistance are expiring, being terminated or not being renewed. Existing middle income tenants in Mitc- hell-Lama and Section 8 housing are faced with eviction if they cannot afford new market rents. Extending the ETPA to these buildings will ensure that existing.tenants can continue to afford to live in their current apartments. ETPA coverage will also enable building owners to more readily be eligible for rent increases under annual ETPA guide- lines. This bill authorizes New York City or any city, town or village in the counties of Westchester, Nassau and Rockland to extend the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (ETPA) to cover rental buildings which: (1) were owned by limited-profit housing companies which voluntarily dissolved or which will dissolve in the future, or (2) were covered by rental assist- ance contracts between their owners and HUD and such contracts expired or terminated previously or will terminate at some future date.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2023-24: A.914 - Referred to Housing 2021-22: A.3676 - Referred to Housing 2019-20: A.1470 - Referred to Housing 2017-18: A.1349 - Referred to Housing 2015-16: A.344 - Referred to Housing 2013-14: A.698 - Referred to Housing 2011-12: A.2499 - Referred to Housing 2009-10: A.9230 - Reported to Rules   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Most costs of administration of ETPA and rent stabilization are covered by per unit fees charged to property owners.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill shall take effect immediately and shall apply to housing accommodations located in buildings or structures owned by housing companies that dissolved on, before, or after such date and to housing accommodations in buildings or structures that were covered projects and had contracts for rental assistance that expired or were terminated on, before, or after such date; provided that the amendments to section 5 of the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four made by section two of this act shall expire on the same date as such act expires and shall not affect the expiration of such act as provided in Section 17 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974.
Go to top