•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A03506 Summary:

BILL NOA03506B
 
SAME ASSAME AS S02235-B
 
SPONSORReyes
 
COSPNSRCarroll R, Rosenthal, Weprin, Simon, Forrest, Cruz, Anderson, Clark, Dinowitz, Mitaynes, Otis, Kelles, Gallagher, Gonzalez-Rojas, Seawright, Hevesi, Jacobson, Burdick, Lavine, Jackson, Meeks, Vanel, Walker, Ramos, Glick, Davila, Bronson, Tapia, Paulin, Lunsford, De Los Santos, Cunningham, Kim, Rivera, Shrestha, Hyndman, Raga, Levenberg, Septimo, Alvarez, Shimsky, Benedetto, Zaccaro, Gibbs, Bichotte Hermelyn, Lee, Chandler-Waterman, Romero, Lasher, Valdez, Taylor, Bores, Torres, Simone, Burroughs, Stirpe, Solages, Dais, Lupardo, Schiavoni, Wright, McDonald, Carroll P, Barrett, Magnarelli, Hooks, Rajkumar, Dilan, Lucas, Hunter, Cashman, Moreno, Zinerman, Powers, Sayegh
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §1.20, add Art 145 §§145.05 - 145.60, CP L; add §§256-b & 63-e, Art 15-AA §§319 & 319-a, Exec L; add Art 19-D §996, Gen Muni L; amd §§500-c & 621, rpld §§147 & 500-f, Cor L; amd §17, Pub Off L; add Art 25 §§1300 - 1302, Ed L
 
Prohibits and regulates the discovery and disclosure of immigration status; prohibits police officers, peace officers, school resource officers, probation agencies, state entities, state employees, and municipal corporations from questioning individuals regarding their citizenship or immigration status; regulates the disclosure of information relating to immigration status; prohibits an educational agency, higher education agency, school employee, school safety personnel, or third-party contractor from collecting information about a person's citizenship, immigration status, nationality, or country of origin, unless required by law or necessary to administer a public program or benefit sought by such person.
Go to top

A03506 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A3506B
 
SPONSOR: Reyes
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, the executive law, the general municipal law, the education law, the correction law and the public officers law, in relation to prohibiting and regulating the discovery and disclosure of immigration status; and to repeal certain provisions of the correction law relating thereto   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: Ensures appropriate use of state and local resources by limiting the use of state and local resources for immigration enforcement purposes.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section one of this bill amends Criminal Procedure Law Section 1.20 to add five new definitional subdivisions, 46 - 50, to define the terms "immigration authorities", "immigration enforcement", "immigration law", "immigration detainer", and "civil immigration warrant." Section two adds a new Article 145 to the Criminal Procedure Law. This article defines the duties of police officers, peace officers, and school resource officers with regard to immigration enforcement. It prohibits officers from using public resources for immigration enforce- ment except when required by law, prohibits investigations, interro- gations, inquires, or collection of information about immigration law violations or about immigration status, nationality, or country of origin except when required by law, prohibits notifications of release date or court dates, prohibits transfer of people to ICE custody, prohibits entering a person's immigration status into a database unless necessary for a public program or benefit, prohibits the use of Immi- gration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as interpreters, and requires written notice of rights to inmates in the event that ICE/CBP are allowed access for interviews. It does not prohibit officers from complying with valid court orders or federal judicial warrants. Section three adds a new Section 256-b to the Executive Law. This section defines the duties of local probation departments with regard to immigration enforcement. It prohibits probation officers from inquiring about immigration status, nationality, or country of origin except when required by law or necessary for a public program or benefit, prohibits communication with immigration authorities about people who are or have been under department supervision and prohibits disclosure of informa- tion. This section further prohibits collection of information about a person's citizenship, immigration status, nationality, or country of origin unless required by law or necessary for a public program or bene- fit, prohibits investigations or interrogations about immigration law violations, prohibits access to non-public areas of the probation agency property by nonlocal law enforcement agencies without a judicial warrant, requires written notice to inmates in the event that ICE/CBP are allowed access for interviews, prohibits entering immigration status into a departmental database unless necessary for a public program or benefit, prohibits investigating a person's immigration status or histo- ry (including providing such information in court-o rdered reports), and prohibits the use of ICE or CBP as interpreters. It does not prohibit local probation agencies from complying with valid court orders or federal judicial warrants. Section four adds a new Article 15-AA to the Executive Law. This article defines the duties of state employees with regard to immigration enforcement. It prohibits state employees from using public resources for immigration enforcement, restricts disclosure of an individual's personally identifiable information such as name, social security number, physical description, home address, or telephone number to immi- gration authorities, prohibits investigations or interrogations about immigration law violations, prohibits inquiries about immigration status, nationality, or country of origin except when required by law or necessary for a public program or benefit, prohibits access by nonlocal law enforcement to nonpublic areas of state property without a judicial warrant, prohibits entering immigration status into a state database unless necessary for a public program or benefit, prohibits the use of ICE or CBP as interpreters, and requires reporting on communications with immigration authorities. It does not prohibit state employees from complying with valid court orders or federal judicial warrants. Section five adds a new article 19-c to the General Municipal Law. This article defines the duties of county, town, city, and village employees with regard to immigration enforcement. It mirrors the same prohibitions that are established in Section 4 relating to state employees, with one exception relating to the authority of municipal officials to comply with certain orders issued by state court judges to produce an individ- ual to court. Section six adds a new Article 25 to the Education Law, which bars all public schools, charter schools, BOCES, higher education institutions, the New York State Education Department, and any employees, school safe- ty personnel, or third party contractors thereof from collecting infor- mation about a person's citizenship or immigration status except as necessary to administer a public program or benefit. All public schools, charter schools, BOCES, higher education institutions, and the New York State Education Department would be required to review their directory information policies within 80 days of the effective date of the bill to ensure that they are not inadvertently disclosing a student or parent's immigration status. These entities must review all of their data collection practices within 180 days, and would be barred from disclos- ing any personally identifiable information to immigration authorities. Educational entities would be required to develop protocols in the event that immigration authorities request data about a student, which must involve immediate parental notification. All requests for data would have to be recorded and included in an annual report which would be a public record. The New York State Education Department would be required to promulgate regulations within 180 days with a model policy, including guidelines on how to respond to immigration authorities' requests for personally iden- tifying information and training requirements for school personnel. Schools would then be required to update their existing privacy policies to ensure compliance. School personnel would be barred from permitting nonlocal civil law enforcement into nonpublic areas of campus property absent a judicial warrant, and section seven of this bill provides that school district transportation contracts would have to include agreements that transpor- tation contractors would comply with a district's policies regarding communication and coordination with immigration authorities. Section eight creates a new subdivision 4-a to section 500-c of the Correction Law to bar county correctional facilities from entering into formal agreements or otherwise allowing their employees to be subject to the direction of supervision of immigration authorities. Section nine repeals section 147 of the Correction Law, which requires correctional facilities to investigate immigrants and share that infor- mation with immigration authorities. Section ten repeals section 500-f of the Corrections Law, which requires jails to collect and make public information such as a person's place of birth, social relations, education, criminal history, discharge, and employment details. Section 11 adds a new subdivision 3 to section 621 of the Correction Law to require law enforcement officers and agencies furnishing information to agencies of other jurisdictions to obtain a certification that such information will not be used for immigration enforcement. Section 12 adds a new section 63-e to the Executive Law to require the attorney general to create guidance on governing databases that limits the availability of information for immigration enforcement to the full- est extent possible and consistent with federal and state law and further requires the attorney general to establish a system to solicit and receive complaints from the public about the improper use of resources by state or local entities or employees for immigration enforcement or the improper sharing of information. Section 13 adds language indemnifying public employees against criminal or civil liability at the federal, state, or local level for actions taken to comply with the bill. Section 14 makes the bill effective immediately.   JUSTIFICATION: The proper role of state and local government and law enforcement is to administer public services and promote public safety under the laws of New York State and its municipalities, not to enforce federal immi- gration law. However, state and local resources are too often misdi- rected to assist immigration authorities in performing duties that fall outside the realm of state and local concern. This entanglement with immigration enforcement undermines the core mission of state and local law enforcement by creating mistrust in immigrant communities and caus- ing immigrants to abstain from reporting crimes or cooperating with investigations. Immigrant New Yorkers who are the victims of crimes and are seeking the assistance of local authorities cannot avail themselves of appropriate government services. This entanglement also encourages racial profiling by providing incentives to make pretextual arrests to transfer people to the custody of immigration authorities. State and local governments have no obligation to participate in immi- gration enforcement. As the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed in 2018, the New York Criminal Procedure Law provides no authority for police officers and peace officers in New York to make arrests for civil immigration violations absent a judicial warrant. See The People, ex rel. Jordan Wells, on behalf of Susan Fran- cis v. DeMarco, 168 A.D.3d 31 (2d Dept 2018). This legislation adds to these existing restrictions on law enforcement officers' authority by restricting information sharing with immigration authorities, prohibit- ing formal agreements to enforce immigration law, and making clear that public resources should not be used for immigration enforcement purposes. The legislation also extends those limitations to other state and local officials and employees. Disentangling local law enforcement from immigration enforcement is critical to protecting the rights of all New Yorkers, ensuring that state and local officers can perform their core duties, promoting commu- nity trust, and preventing disruption of workplaces, families and support systems throughout the state. Doing so will help keep irreplace- able workers in the workplace, maintain important sources of tax reven- ue, and prevent unnecessary dependence on social services, aiding New York taxpayers and the state economy and benefiting all residents of New York State.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2025 - 2026: Referred to Codes 2024-2023: S987 - Referred to Codes 2021-2022: S3076B - Referred to Codes 2020: S7562 - Referred to Codes   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediate
Go to top