•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A04877 Summary:

BILL NOA04877C
 
SAME ASSAME AS S04659-C
 
SPONSORShrestha
 
COSPNSRRosenthal, Shimsky, Kelles, Romero, Reyes, Gallagher, Levenberg, Burroughs, Forrest, Steck, Valdez, Meeks, Cunningham, Tapia, Davila, Burdick, De Los Santos, Clark, Bronson, Jacobson, Gonzalez-Rojas, Mitaynes, Simon, Carroll R, Simone, Lee, Schiavoni, Otis, Seawright, Raga, Taylor, Lasher, Anderson, Bores, Moreno, Septimo, Wright, Dinowitz, Walker, Stirpe, Torres
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§3 & 5, Emerg Ten Prot Act of 1974
 
Relates to enacting the rent emergency stabilization for tenants act on local determinations of a housing emergency; authorizes a city with a population of one million or more to declare an emergency as to any class of housing accommodations if the vacancy rate for the housing accommodations in such class within such municipality is not in excess of five percent and a declaration of emergency may be made as to all housing accommodations if the vacancy rate for the housing accommodations within such municipality is not in excess of five percent; authorizes other cities, towns and villages to declare a housing emergency after considering publicly available data and holding public hearings.
Go to top

A04877 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A4877C
 
SPONSOR: Shrestha
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seven- ty-four, in relation to enacting the rent emergency stabilization for tenants act on local determinations of a housing emergency   PURPOSE: This bill amends the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 to expand the range of factors villages, towns, and cities other than New York City may consider to declare a housing emergency and adopt rent stabili- zation; allows them to apply rent stabilization to buildings built more than 15 years ago (rather than only buildings built before 1974, as provided under current law); and allows them to rent-stabilize apart- ments in 4- or 5-unit buildings, in addition to those in buildings with 6 or more units. The bill will have no effect in New York City or in any municipality that does not choose through its local government to make use of its provisions.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill establishes the short title for this act as the "rent emergency stabilization for tenants act" (the REST Act), Section 2 of the bill amends Section 3 of section 4 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974 to provide that villages, towns, and cities other than New York City may determine whether to declare a housing emergency using one of two methods. -- The municipality may, after considering publicly available data and holding public hearings, declare a housing emergency based on various factors, such as overall housing supply, vacancy rates, the availability of affordable and habitable housing accommodations, rent burdens, or other measures of housing affordability such as the local or regional homelessness rate and the need for regulating rents in that locality. -- In the alternative, the municipality may declare a housing emergency based on a study of vacancy rates in rental housing, pursuant to a proc- ess that is unchanged by this bill. In villages, towns, and cities other than New York City in which the local government has already opted in to rent stabilization before the effective date of this act, the local government may similarly use either of these two methods to add buildings not built or substantially rehabilitated within the past 15 years under the provisions of the new paragraph 5-b, summarized below. The manner in which New York City may declare a housing emergency is unchanged by this bill. Section 2 also authorizes villages, towns, and cities other than New York City to provide for rent stabilization in buildings with fewer than six but not fewer than four units if they choose. Section 3 of the bill adds a new paragraph 5-b to subdivision a of section 5 of section 4 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974 to specify that in villages, towns, and cities other than New York City that provide for rent regulation, buildings that were built or substantially rehabilitated within the past 15 years, are exempt from regulation; under the ETPA currently, buildings that were built or substantially rehabilitated after January 1, 1974 are exempt, unless they are regu- lated pursuant to another law or regulation. Section 4 of the bill sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Rent stabilization in localities other than New York City is governed by the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (ETPA). Under the ETPA in its original form, municipalities in Nassau, Rockland, and Westchester counties may adopt rent stabilization if they declare a state of housing emergency, defined as having a rental housing vacancy rate of less than 5% in building classes they designate to be regulated. The Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA) amended the ETPA so that any municipality in the state may opt into rent stabilization if it meets the emergency declaration criteria. According to HCR's most recent data, a total of 40 localities outside of New York City have adopted rent regulation: 16 in Nassau, 2 in Rockland, 21 in Westchester, and 1 in Ulster (the City of Kingston). To adopt rent stabilization under current law, a municipality must conduct a formal study to determine whether to declare a housing emer- gency. The study must examine only housing built before 1974 and only in buildings with 6 or more units, even if this is a very small portion of the housing in the area; and the sole factor the study may consider is whether the vacancy rate in this subset of the housing stock is below 5 percent. If this standard is met, the municipality may declare an emer- gency and adopt rent regulation, but only for this subset of their hous- ing, built more than half a century ago. There are about 150 jurisdictions other than New York State that have rent regulation laws; none include language that defines a housing emer- gency based on a single, quantifiable threshold similar to New York's five-percent vacancy threshold, according to analysis conducted by the Community Service Society of New York. The Rent Emergency Stabilization for Tenants (REST) Act recognizes that, in addition to vacancy rates, publicly available data on a locality's eviction rate, homeless shelter population, renters' housing cost burdens, and other relevant indicators can also demonstrate a locality's lack of housing availability, affordability, and stability. For example, eviction filing data in each county is available and updated monthly on the Office of Court Administration's Statewide Landlord Tenant Eviction Dashboard, and localities may have access to data on their local home- less shelters. These metrics can paint a fuller picture of a locality's housing needs and can fulfill the ETPA's requirement that localities may institute rent stabilization only after declaring a housing emergency. At the same time, there may be localities that wish to declare an emer- gency pursuant to the existing process, based on the vacancy rate; this bill leaves that process unchanged. The REST Act also seeks to update the ETPA so that localities adopting rent stabilization may do so in a way that makes sense for the here and now. The ETPA in its current form extends rent stabilization to build- ings with six or more units, an easy threshold to reach in high-density New York City where multifamily residential buildings are more common. Recognizing that the mix of housing varies widely across the state, this legislation would allow localities to set a lower building size thresh- old of four or more units for rent stabilization coverage. Finally, when the ETPA went into effect in June 1974, the law permitted localities to apply rent stabilization to eligible buildings that had been constructed at that point -- on or before January 1, 1974. This eligibility date has not changed in over 50 years. More recently, when the legislature enacted the Good Cause Eviction law, it exempted all buildings built within the last 15 years. This bill would reflect the ETPA's original intent of enabling localities to provide rent stabilization protections to a substantial portion of their housing, not just to buildings that are half a century old, by including buildings constructed or substan- tially rehabilitated more than 15 years ago.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2025: A4877 (Shrestha) - Referred to Housing. S4659 (Kavanagh) - Referred to Housing, Construction and Community Development.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Minimal.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top