•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A05983 Summary:

BILL NOA05983
 
SAME ASSAME AS S02382
 
SPONSORFitzpatrick
 
COSPNSRRa, Tague, Simpson, Novakhov, Gandolfo, Bendett, Smullen, Angelino, Lemondes, Brown E, Hawley, DiPietro, Durso, Jensen, Paulin, McDonough, Beephan, Mikulin, DeStefano, Manktelow, Maher, Palmesano
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §215-d, Lab L
 
Prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for confronting an individual to prevent a theft or the unlawful taking of goods, wares, or merchandise; does not prohibit employers from training or re-training employees on policies against confrontation of theft.
Go to top

A05983 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A5983
 
SPONSOR: Fitzpatrick
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the labor law, in relation to prohibiting employers from retaliating against employees for confronting an individual to prevent a theft or the unlawful taking of goods, wares, or merchandise   PURPOSE: To protect employees from retaliation by an employer if an employee confronts or attempts to confront an individual to prevent a theft.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Amends the Labor law by adding a new section 215-d to prohibit retali- ation by an employer against an employee who confronts an individual to prevent a theft or the unlawful taking of goods, wares, or merchandise. In addition, an employer may not penalize or retaliate against any employee by reducing work hours, denying a promotion or decreasing pay.   JUSTIFICATION: While it is important that retail stores focus on protecting their employees or instituting policies advising employees against confronta- tion to prevent .a theft, an employee who intervenes in such attempt should not be penalized including termination of the job. The current explosion in retail theft, which shows no signs of subsiding, whether it is organized retail crime or a lone individual acting on their own behalf, has created turmoil in the industry for both employers and employees. The unfortunate outcome has resulted in job loss for many employees who react to these crimes by intervening in an attempt to stop these criminals. Nothing in this bill is intended to encourage employee interactions with criminals committing theft of merchandise. In fact, it is only common sense that for stores who have security personnel, that job is best left up to trained professionals. This bill simply states that an employee intervening in an attempt to thwart a theft, that employee will not be subjected to job termination.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2024: A.7976 Held for Consideration in Labor S.7639 Referred to Rules   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top