•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A08492 Summary:

BILL NOA08492C
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORWeprin
 
COSPNSRSteck
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §837-aa, Exec L
 
Requires the commissioner of the division of criminal justice services, the superintendent of the division of state police, and the commissioner of the department of corrections and community supervision and the person in charge of every state law enforcement agency to adopt and implement a tattoo policy for all members of such law enforcement agency who are designated as police officers, peace officers and applicants for employment in such positions.
Go to top

A08492 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A8492C
 
SPONSOR: Weprin
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to requiring state law enforcement agencies to develop and implement a tattoo policy   PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to enact a uniform, fair, and constitu- tionally sound tattoo policy for law enforcement agencies in New York State that respects both the professional image of law enforcement offi- cers and their individual rights and abilities to express themselves   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 adds a new section 837-aa to the executive law. Section 2 is the effective date.   DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND AMENDED VERSION (IF APPLICABLE): The B print removes provisions regarding prohibited tattoos and amends the language to provide that the policy shall at minimum include the non-exhaustive list. Clarifies that this bill will not prohibit anyone currently employed who has tattoos from continuing serve after this legislation. The C print makes a technical amendment, creating a new section 837-aa in the executive law instead of 837-z.   JUSTIFICATION: Under current law, law enforcement agencies across New York State have inconsistent or outdated policies regarding visible tattoos. These discrepancies can lead to unequal treatment of officers, hinder recruit- ment efforts, and invite legal challenges related to First Amendment and employment rights. For decades, many police agencies in the United States had policies strictly regulating the wearing of tattoos among their officers. Most agencies either prohibited tattoos altogether or, at a minimum, placed restrictions on their size and/or required that they be covered at all times. The prevailing attitude was that tattoos were unprofessional and might be perceived as intimidating or inappropriate by members of the community. Such restrictions have had an impact on police hiring-until recently. A surge in the popularity of tattoos, especially among young people, has forced police agencies to reconsider their traditional thinking on the issue. As generational norms around tattoos have evolved, a growing number of qualified applicants and current officers have visible tattoos that are not offensive or inappropriate. A standardized, reasonable policy will help agencies maintain a professional appearance while respecting the rights and individuality of, law enforcement personnel. In addition, clear guidance will improve transparency, limit subjective decision-mak- ing by departments, and support diversity and inclusion in law enforce- ment hiring and retention. This policy also directly affects the veteran community as tattoos are very much a part of military culture and a large proportion of service members have tattoos. If the state of New York values veterans and their service, they should adopt this policy which would allow individuals with tattoos that are not offensive or inappropriate to be eligible for employment with all law enforcement agencies within the state. At a time when police departments around the country are struggling to recruit and retain good, qualified law enforcement officers, and with criminal justice and policing reform front and center in national discussion, the state of New York should be doing everything it can to recruit and retain the best candidates possible. A 2017 report by the U.S. Department of Justice "Hiring for 215t Century Law Enforcement Officer: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies for Success" stated: "Police Departments Need to Ease Tattoo Restrictions in Order to Attract More Applicants 29% of Americans have at least one tattoo per a 2016 Harris Poll and 69% of those have two or more. While only 13% of Baby Boomers, 10% of those age 70 or more, 36% of those age 46 to 50 have a tattoo, 47% of Millennials reportedly have a tattoo and 37% have more than one. This means that nearly half of police recruits have a tattoo. You can have visible tattoos and be a teacher, join the military, even be a legislator! There is no reason why tattoos should be an automatic disqualifier to joining any New York State law enforcement agency if those tattoos are not offensive or inappropriate.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: This is a new bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Go to top