•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A03635 Summary:

BILL NOA03635
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORJones
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §100.25, CP L
 
Relates to supporting depositions that are served at the time of issuance of a simplified information.
Go to top

A03635 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A3635
 
SPONSOR: Jones
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to supporting depositions that are served at the time of issuance of a simplified information   PURPOSE: Complainant police officer or public servant serving a copy of the supporting deposition at the time of issuance of a simplified informa- tion shall be prima facie proof that the supporting deposition was served upon the defendant with the simplified information.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends subdivision 2 of section 100.25 of the criminal proce- dure law to include supporting depositions given in conjunction with the simplified information to be filed with the court with proof of service thereof meets the requirement of providing said deposition upon request of the defendant. This establishes that roadside service of an affidavit of a supporting deposition concurrent with the issuing of the ticket satisfies service of a supporting deposition requirement. Section 2 This act shall take effect immediately.   JUSTIFICATION: Currently, supporting depositions provided at the time of service do not fulfill the requirement of providing said document to the defendant. People v Wagschal, 2018 Slip Op 28051 (App. Tam, 2d Dept, Feb. 15, 2018), the court found that roadside service of a supporting deposition alone does not satisfy the service requirements outlined in law. The court determined that failure to file an affidavit of service of supporting deposition requires dismissal. The record demonstrated that a supporting depbsition had been filed with the courts but was not accom- panied with any "proof of service thereof'. This failed to demonstrate full compliance with CPL 100.25 (2). The court determined the failure to file an affidavit of service of a supporting deposition requires dismissal. This measure simplifies the procedure and clarifies that when a support- ing deposition is served concurrent with simplified information it satisfies notice requirements under CPL 100.25 (2). If no service is not effectuated with simplified information, the defendant retains their right to demand such service of a supporting deposition.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New Bill
Go to top