•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A04932 Summary:

BILL NOA04932
 
SAME ASSAME AS S02587
 
SPONSORLee
 
COSPNSRGallagher, Shimsky, Dais, McDonough, Chang, Hevesi, Sayegh, Raga
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §168-a, Exec L
 
Establishes January 30th of each year as a day of commemoration known as "Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution".
Go to top

A04932 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A4932
 
SPONSOR: Lee
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to establishing January thirtieth of each year as a day of commemoration known as "Fred Koremat- su Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution"   PURPOSE: To establish January thirtieth of each year as a day of commemoration known as "Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution."   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends subdivision 3 of section 168-a of the executive law to establish January thirtieth of each year as a day of commemoration known as "Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution." Section 2 sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: In February 1942, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor and U.S.• entry into World War II, President Roosevelt issued an executive order permitting the U.S. military to "prescribe military areas ... from which any or all persons may be excluded."(1) A subsequent executive order created the War Relocation Authority, whose mission was "to provide for the removal from designated areas of persons whose removal is necessary in the interests of national security."(2) Lt. General John DeWitt, military commander of the Western Defense Command, issued a series of public proclamations establishing certain areas from which "(any Japanese, German or Italian alien, or any person of Japanese ancestry" were restricted in their movements or excluded altogether.(3) A series of civilian exclusion orders followed, directing that all persons of Japanese ancestry report to "civil control stations," to receive further instructions and transport to "their new residence."' While the United States was fighting in Europe and Asia to protect and defend democracy and freedom abroad, thousands of West Coast residents of Japanese descent, many of them citizens, were summoned on no more than a few days notice, and told to leave behind homes, businesses, possessions, and communities, and to report to central locations from which they were then sent to internment camps for the duration of the war. According to the U.S National Archives and Records Administration, over 120,000 persons of Japanese descent, 70,000 of whom were citizens, were forcibly moved to "assembly centers" and then sent to "relocation centers," located in remote areas in the western United States. (Despite this treatment, many enlisted or were drafted into the military and 30,000 Japanese Americans served with distinction during World War II.)(5) Fred Korematsu, a son of Japanese immigrants, born in Oakland Califor- nia, refused to go. Having tried to enlist at the start of the war and been turned down, he worked as a welder, only to be 'fired due to his Japanese ancestry. When the rest of his family members were forcibly relocated to an internment camp, Mr. Korematsu stayed in California. Subsequently arrested, prosecuted, convicted in federal court of diso- beying a military order, and sent to a relocation camp, Mr. Korematsu's appeal of his conviction made its way to the United States Supreme Court.(6) In Korematsu v. United States, the Court upheld Mr. Korematsu's conviction and the related policy under which the U.S. government ordered that individuals, including American citizens, be excluded from their homes and communities, and be relocated and detained indefinitely purely on the basis of ethnic origin.(7) In dissenting from the Court's ruling, Justice Robert Jackson said: "Korematsu has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime. It consists merely of being present in the state whereof he is a citizen, near the place where he was born, and where all his life he has lived.(8)Justice Frank Murphy called the exclusion order "the legalization of racism.(9) At the end of the war, upon release from internment, Fred Korematsu went on to rebuild his life, got married, had children, and became a civil rights activist, lobbying for redress of the wrongs done to Japanese-Am- ericans during World War II and doing what he could to ensure no such harms would befall others and that the U.S government would not repeat past mistakes. Mr. Korematsu died on March 30, 2005. Mr. Korematsu's conviction was overturned in 1984 after his case was reopened on the basis of government misconduct. Thanks to his efforts as a member of the National Coalition for Redress and Reparations, the U.S Congress passed a bill granting a formal apology and token compensation to affected Japanese-Americans in 1988. However, the U.S. Supreme Court never officially overruled its determination in Korematsu v. United States that the policy under which Mr. Korematsu was arrested, prose- cuted, convicted, and interned was lawful. In 2018, in a decision upholding a ban on the entry of foreign nationals from certain Muslim-majority countries into the United States, Trump v. Hawaii, Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the Court, said: "The forcible relocation of U.S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority.- Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history, and - to be clear - 'has no place in law under the Constitution,'" citing Justice Jackson's dissent in Korematsu in 1944.(10) In order that we learn from the lessons of history, and to honor the bravery and persistence of Fred Korematsu, and his fight for justice, the state of New York should join the growing number of states, includ- ing California, New Jersey, Hawaii, Virginia, Michigan, and Arizona,fl in declaring January 30th the "Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution."   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2023-2024: Passed senate, governmental operations.   FISCAL IMPACT: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately. (1)Exec. Order No. 9066, 7 Fed. Reg. 1407 (February 25, 1942) (Authoriz- ing the Secretary of War to Prescribe Military Areas), available at https://catalog.archives.gov/id/5730250; see also Executive Order 9066: Resulting in Japanese-American Incarceration (1942), National Archives, available at https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/executive-order-9066; 2 (2)Exec. Order No. 9102, 7 Fed. Reg. 2165 (March 20, 1942) (Establishing the War Relocation Authority in the Executive Office of the President and Defining Its Functions and Duties), available at https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-9102-establ ishing-the-war-relocation-authority-the-executive-office-the (3) Western Defense Command Public Proclamation No. 1 (March 2, 1942) (Establishing military zones where certain "persons or classes of persons" will be excluded), available at https://digitalcollections.lib.washington.edu/digital/collection/pion eerlife/id/15329/rec/5; American Civil Liberties Union of NOrthern Cali- fornia Records--Case Files, 1934-1993--Korematsu, Fred, 1942-1946, available at https://digitallibrary.californiahistoricalsociety.org/object/aclu-ko rematsu; Personal Justice Denied, Report of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, December 1982, at 100 et seq., available at https://www.archives.gov/research/japanese- americans/justice-denied (4) Civilian Exclusion Orders, Densho Encyclopedia, available at https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Civilian_exclusion_orders/. Examples of civilian exclusion orders available at https://catalog.archives.gov/id/536017; https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Civilian_exclusion_ordersh • https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/nmah_1694663. (5)Executive Order 9066: Resulting in Japanese-American Incarceration (1942), National Archives, available at https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/executive-order-9066 (6) Fred Korematsu's Story, Fred T. Korematsu Institute, available at https://korematsuinstitute.org/freds-story/. (7) Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). In Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943), and Yasui v. United States, 320 U.S. 115 (1943), the Supreme Court earlier upheld the convictions of Minoru Yasui and Gordon Hirabayashi, who like Mr. Korematsu refused to cooper- ate with the exclusion orders and to go willingly to internment camps. One woman, Mitsuye Endo, who reported to an internment camp but filed for a writ of habeas corpus, won her case and was released after two years, see Lori Aritani, She Fought the Internment of Japanese Americans during World War II and Won, Wash. Post, Dec. 18, 2019. (8) Korematsu at 243. (9) Korematsu at 242. (10) Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 585 U.S.(2018). (11) Fred Kore- matsu Day, Fred T. Korematsu Institute, https://korematsuinstitute.org/what-is-fred-korematsu-day/
Go to top