Clarifies that the statutory damages available for certain wage violations are not punitive in nature and are designed to be liquidated damages rather than penalties or to compensate workers for the employer's failure to prevent wage theft and for the harm to employees that results from such failure.
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
BILL NUMBER: A5000
SPONSOR: Bronson TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the labor law, in relation to liquidated damages for
labor law violations
PURPOSE::
To align the rights of plaintiffs in state court with those in federal
court, where class action plaintiffs can claim liquidated and statutory
damages for certain wage violations.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS::
Section 1 would provide the title of the act, "Labor Law Enforcement
Parity Act."
Section 2 would provide the legislative intent.
Section 3 amends the labor law by Subdivision 3 of section 198, permi
ting plaintiffs in state court to recover statutory and liquidated
damages in wage theft class actions.
Section 4 amends the labor law by Subdivision 1 of section 663, author-
izing plaintiffs in class actions to recover statutory damages in state
court
Section 5. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all
actions concerning labor law violations that occurred within the six
years prior to this act's effective date.
JUSTIFICATION::
The Legislature has recently made efforts to enhance the Labor Law's
protections against wage theft. However, a lesser-known section of the
Civil Practice Law and Rules has been a barrier for many workers seeking
to recover unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and statutory damages under
the Labor Law on a class-wide basis. The Labor Law Enforcement Parity
Act (LLEPA) aims to align the rights of plaintiffs in state court with
those in federal court, where class action plaintiffs can claim liqui-
dated and statutory damages. Several New York state courts have ruled
that class action plaintiffs enforcing the Labor Law in state courts are
not entitled to liquidated damages
(which are awarded in individual actions as amounts equal to unpaid
wages) due to a restriction in CPLR 901(b) against recovering "penal-
ties" in class actions. See, e.g., Divlijanovic v. Saks & Co., 2018 N.Y.
Slip Op. 30236, at *12-13
(N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2018). This stance persists despite recognition by numer-
ous federal and state courts that recent amendments to the Labor Law
made liquidated damages compensatory rather than penal. For instance,
Rana v. Islam, 887 F.3d 118, 123 (2d Cir. 2018), and Vega
v. CM & Assocs. Constr. Mgmt., LLC, 175 A.D.3d 1144, 1146 (1st Dep't
2019) acknowledged the amendments aimed to align with the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA), emphasizing compensation over deterrence. Howev-
er, some courts, like in Divlijanovic and Griffin v. Gregorys Coffee
Mgmt. LLC, 2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 31125 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019), have over-
looked the legislative intent to categorize liquidated damages under the
Labor Law as compensatory. Moreover, class-wide claims for statutory
damages under the Wage Theft Prevention Act have been disallowed by New
York State courts based on their interpretation of CPLR § 901(b), which
limits. class-wide claims involving, statutory minimum recoveries. This
interpretation forces workers pursuing class actions in state court to
forgo their right to liquidated damages, effectively losing up to 50% of
the damages they are owed. Additionally, it prevents them from making
any class-wide claims for violations of the Wage Theft Prevention A ct.
Conversely, in federal court, such actions allow for the recovery of
these damages on a class-wide basis, as seen in Shady Grove Orthopedic
Assocs., P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 559 U.S. 393, 413
(2010) and Vargas v. Howard, 324 F.R.D. 319 (S.D.N.Y. 2018).
The frequent inability to pursue Labor Law claims in federal court
(because there is no basis for federal jurisdiction, such as a federal
claim or diversity of citizenship) leaves workers without an effective
means to recover liquidated damages for wage theft violations and statu-
tory damages for Wage Theft Prevention Act violations. This is partic-
ularly harmful to low-wage workers and workers with smaller claims, for
whom individual suits are unfeasible and class actions are critical in
allowing them to vindicate their rights. LLEPA's amendment to Sections
198 and 663 of the Labor Law will give state court plaintiffs seeking
class-wide relief the same rights as those in federal court to seek
liquidated and statutory damages, thus ensuring that the Labor Law is
enforced equally in state and federal courts.
FISCAL IMPACT:
TBD
EFFECTIVE DATE::
This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all actions
concerning labor law violations that occurred within the six years prior
to this act's effective date.
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
5000
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
February 10, 2025
___________
Introduced by M. of A. BRONSON, SIMON, McMAHON, RAGA -- read once and
referred to the Committee on Labor
AN ACT to amend the labor law, in relation to liquidated damages for
labor law violations
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Short Title. This act shall be known and may be cited as
2 the "labor law enforcement parity act".
3 § 2. Legislative Findings. 1. The legislature finds and declares that
4 it has always been its intention that the remedies provided under the
5 labor law be fully and equally enforceable in both state and federal
6 court. However, some state courts have misconstrued the liquidated
7 damages available for violations of the labor law as penalties, despite
8 the fact that the legislature amended the labor law's liquidated damages
9 provision in 2009 and 2010 to bring it in line with the compensatory
10 purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act's liquidated damages provision.
11 As a result, while employees have been able to recover the full amount
12 of compensatory liquidated damages owed to them in federal court
13 actions, they are not always able to do so in state court actions.
14 Accordingly, the first purpose of this bill is to clarify that all
15 liquidated damages available for violations of the labor law, which are
16 generally an amount equal to the unpaid or underpaid wages, are compen-
17 satory in nature and not penalties.
18 2. The legislature further finds and declares that both federal and
19 state courts have recently misconstrued the purposes of New York Labor
20 Law § 195. Despite allowing claims for violations of the labor law's
21 wage notice and wage statement provisions to proceed for years, and
22 allowing workers to recover the full statutory damages provided under
23 the labor law for these violations, some federal courts have begun
24 dismissing these claims for lack of Article III standing, claiming that
25 these violations do not cause workers any concrete injury. Meanwhile,
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06533-01-5
A. 5000 2
1 some state courts have misconstrued the statutory damages available for
2 violations of the wage notice and wage statement provisions as penalties
3 and have thus not allowed workers to recover the statutory damages
4 provided, even though they have been able to do so in many federal
5 courts. Accordingly, the second purpose of this bill is to clarify that
6 the statutory damages available for violations of the wage notice and
7 statement provisions of the law are not punitive in nature, and are
8 instead designed to compensate workers for their employer's failure to
9 prevent wage theft in the first place, and the harms employees suffer as
10 a result, including being unable to discover, identify, and remedy wage
11 theft promptly and possible loss of valid wage theft claims due to the
12 passage of the statute of limitations, the stress and uncertainty caused
13 by unclear pay details, which can significantly impact their ability to
14 make informed employment choices, effectively manage their finances, and
15 plan for personal, familial, or social commitments.
16 § 3. Subdivision 3 of section 198 of the labor law, as amended by
17 chapter 397 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows:
18 3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action to recover
19 upon a liability imposed by this article must be commenced within six
20 years. The statute of limitations shall be tolled from the date an
21 employee files a complaint with the commissioner or the commissioner
22 commences an investigation, whichever is earlier, until an order to
23 comply issued by the commissioner becomes final, or where the commis-
24 sioner does not issue an order, until the date on which the commissioner
25 notifies the complainant that the investigation has concluded. Investi-
26 gation by the commissioner shall not be a prerequisite to nor a bar
27 against a person bringing a civil action under this section. All employ-
28 ees shall have the right to recover full wages, benefits and wage
29 supplements, statutory damages, and liquidated damages accrued during
30 the six years previous to the commencing of such action, whether such
31 action is instituted by the employee or by the commissioner, including
32 in a class action. There is no exception to liability under this
33 section for the unauthorized failure to pay wages, benefits or wage
34 supplements.
35 § 4. Subdivision 1 of section 663 of the labor law, as amended by
36 chapter 564 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:
37 1. By employee. If any employee is paid by [his or her] such employ-
38 ee's employer less than the wage to which [he or she] such employee is
39 entitled under the provisions of this article, [he or she] such employee
40 shall recover in a civil action the amount of any such underpayments,
41 together with costs all reasonable attorney's fees, prejudgment interest
42 as required under the civil practice law and rules, and unless the
43 employer proves a good faith basis to believe that its underpayment of
44 wages was in compliance with the law, an additional amount as liquidated
45 damages equal to one hundred percent of the total of such underpayments
46 found to be due, including in a class action. Any agreement between the
47 employee, and the employer to work for less than such wage shall be no
48 defense to such action.
49 § 5. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all
50 actions concerning labor law violations that occurred within the six
51 years prior to this act's effective date.
