A06663 Summary:
BILL NO | A06663A |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S00363-A |
  | |
SPONSOR | Lee |
  | |
COSPNSR | Steck, Kelles, Gonzalez-Rojas, Colton, Magnarelli, Glick, Otis, Davila, McDonough |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
Add §396-yy, Gen Bus L | |
  | |
Establishes the "New York junk fee prevention act"; requires clear and conspicuous pricing practices regarding trash junk fees. |
A06663 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A6663A SPONSOR: Lee
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law, in relation to clear and conspicuous pricing practices regarding mandatory junk fees   PURPOSE:: To eliminate hidden junk fees by requiring sellers to display the total price of a good or service, inclusive of all mandatory fees.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:: Section one of the bill refers to the title of the act, the "New York Junk Fee Prevention Act." Section two of the bill amends the general business law by adding a new § 396-yy, which includes five subdivisions. Subdivision 1 defines "mandatory fee" while making certain exceptions. It also defines "total price" as the full price that a consumer must pay, inclusive of all mandatory fees associated with the transaction. Subdivision 2 requires any person or entity who solicits or facilitates a purchase directly from a consumer to clearly and conspicuously display the total price of a good or service, inclusive of all mandatory fees, in every offer or advertisement in most circumstances, and disclosure of mandatory fee exceptions prior to accepting payment. Subdivision 3 relates to the enforcement of this section, authorizing the attorney general to bring actions and seek injunctions. It also allows private individuals adversely affected by violations of this section to sue for damages. Subdivision 4 sets forth compliance for those: providing broadband in compliance with the relevant federal regulations; cable services in compliance with the relevant federal regulations; financial institutions which comply with listed federal standards; those imposing surcharges on sales transactions where a consumer elects to use a credit card instead of other payment means; food service establishments which display the percentage of automatic and mandatory gratuity to be charged; services that contain a total price that cannot be reasonably known at the time of an offer as long as there is a clear.and conspicuous disclosure of factors, mandatory fees, and that the total price may vary; ongoing auctions that clearly and conspicuously disclose all amounts required to be paid and that the total price may vary; and short-term lodging accom- modations that comply with the relevant federal regulations. Subdivision 5 provides that those subject to subdivision four of § 25.07 of the arts and cultural affairs law, and air carriers, shall not be subject to the provisions of this section. Section three of the bill adds a severability clause. Section four of the bill relates to the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Consumers have become all too familiar with the hidden costs of junk fees. Rarely can someone complete a transaction without getting hit with a service fee, fulfillment fee, convenience fee, or some other hidden charge. These junk fees raise the prices of everything from concert tickets and hotel bookings to car rentals and Internet services. In addition to harming consumers, junk fees place honest businesses at a competitive disadvantage. Companies that immediately disclose the total price of their products inclusive of all mandatory fees will often lose customers to bad faith actors who advertise a lower charge but actually charge more. By allowing junk fees to proliferate, the market ends up rewarding companies that engage in predatory bait-and-switch tactics while punishing those that are transparent with consumers. Similar legislation has been enacted in California, Minnesota, Colorado, Virginia and Massachusetts. Bills have been introduced in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, North Carolina', Rhode Island, and at the federal level.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:: 2024: S7783-B (Gianaris) PASSED SENATE / A9192 (Lee) died in consumer protection   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:: None to the state.   EFFECTIVE DATE:: This act shall take effect on the first of January next succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law.