•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A07172 Summary:

BILL NOA07172B
 
SAME ASSAME AS S10574
 
SPONSORBichotte Hermelyn
 
COSPNSRTapia
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §837, Exec L
 
Requires the division of criminal justice services to promulgate a written protocol for the regulation of the use of artificial intelligence and facial recognition technology in criminal investigations.
Go to top    

A07172 Actions:

BILL NOA07172B
 
03/21/2025referred to codes
01/07/2026referred to codes
03/05/2026amend (t) and recommit to codes
03/05/2026print number 7172a
04/13/2026amend and recommit to codes
04/13/2026print number 7172b
05/13/2026reported referred to ways and means
06/03/2026reported referred to rules
06/03/2026reported
06/03/2026rules report cal.396
06/03/2026ordered to third reading rules cal.396
Go to top

A07172 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A7172B
 
SPONSOR: Bichotte Hermelyn
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to the regulation of the use of artificial intelligence and facial recognition technology in criminal investigations   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The purpose of this bill is to address the legal and ethical concerns associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and facial recognition technologies in criminal investigations, ensuring transpar- ency and reliability while protecting the rights of defendants.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1. Establishes legislative intent. Section 2. Amends Section 837 of the executive law by adding new subdi- vision 24 to regulate the use of AI and facial recognition technology in criminal investigations. Section 3. would provide for the effective date.   DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND AMENDED VERSION (IF APPLICABLE): The B print makes clarifying changes to the promulgation of protocols for law enforcement agencies and conforming changes to the definition of "artificial intelligence".   JUSTIFICATION: Artificial intelligence and facial recognition technologies have been increasingly utilized in criminal investigations, significantly impact- ing the legal landscape. The lack of transparency in AI methodologies and concerns over their accuracy have led to successful legal challenges against the use of AI-generated evidence. This legislation,seeks to balance the benefits of AI in investigative processes with the need for fairness and reliability in the use of these AI systems.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Minimal.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act would take effect ninety days after becoming law.
Go to top

A07172 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         7172--B
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                     March 21, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  BICHOTTE HERMELYN,  TAPIA  --  read once and
          referred to the Committee on Codes -- recommitted to the Committee  on
          Codes  in  accordance  with  Assembly  Rule  3,  sec.  2  -- committee
          discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
          to said committee -- again reported from said  committee  with  amend-
          ments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
 
        AN  ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to the regulation of the
          use of artificial intelligence and facial  recognition  technology  in
          criminal investigations
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Legislative intent.   Artificial  intelligence  tools  like
     2  Cybercheck and facial recognition technologies have been used extensive-
     3  ly  in  criminal  investigations across the U.S., including nearly 8,000
     4  cases in 40 states. However, their  use  has  raised  significant  legal
     5  challenges  due  to  the lack of transparency in their methodologies and
     6  concerns over accuracy and reliability. Defense attorneys have  success-
     7  fully  argued  in  several  cases  that  AI-generated evidence should be
     8  excluded from court proceedings due to these issues. This  act  aims  to
     9  address  these  concerns by prohibiting the use of AI outputs, including
    10  facial recognition, as evidence while allowing their  use  for  investi-
    11  gative  purposes,  thereby protecting the rights of defendants and main-
    12  taining the integrity of the judicial process.
    13    § 2. Section 837 of the executive law  is  amended  by  adding  a  new
    14  subdivision 25 to read as follows:
    15    25.  (a)  Promulgate  a written protocol to standardize and detail for
    16  law enforcement agencies that utilize  artificial  intelligence  in  the
    17  investigation  of  criminal  activity.  The  protocol  shall address the
    18  following topics:
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD11032-04-6

        A. 7172--B                          2
 
     1    (i) AI systems and FRT being used for investigative purposes,  includ-
     2  ing but not limited to data analysis, pattern recognition, facial recog-
     3  nition, and predictive analytics;
     4    (ii)  AI  systems  and  FRT  used  to  assist in identifying potential
     5  suspects, uncovering evidence, and generating investigative leads;
     6    (iii) requiring law enforcement agencies that utilize AI  systems  and
     7  FRT to implement transparency measures, including maintaining records of
     8  AI-generated  outputs  and  the  parameters  used by the AI system. Such
     9  records shall be subject to audit and review by an independent oversight
    10  body designated by the department to ensure compliance with  the  proto-
    11  col;
    12    (iv)  requiring  law  enforcement agencies that utilize AI systems and
    13  FRT to undergo regular independent audits of FRT systems to assess their
    14  accuracy and biases. The results  of  these  audits  shall  be  publicly
    15  accessible and disclosed in any case where FRT evidence is used; and
    16    (v) requiring law enforcement officers that utilize AI systems and FRT
    17  receive  thorough  training  on  the  limitations  and  proper use of AI
    18  systems and FRT, emphasizing the importance of understanding  and  miti-
    19  gating biases and errors.
    20    (b) For the purposes of this subdivision:
    21    (i)  "artificial  intelligence"  or  "AI" means a machine-based system
    22  that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions,
    23  recommendations, or decisions influencing real or virtual  environments,
    24  and  that  uses  machine-  and  human-based  inputs to perceive real and
    25  virtual environments, abstract  such  perceptions  into  models  through
    26  analysis  in  an  automated manner, and use model inference to formulate
    27  options for information or action;
    28    (ii) "AI-generated output" means any information, analysis,  or  deci-
    29  sion produced by an AI system during a criminal investigation, including
    30  but  not  limited to facial recognition, predictive policing models, and
    31  other machine learning algorithms; and
    32    (iii) "facial recognition technology" or "FRT" means a technology that
    33  analyzes facial features and is capable of identifying  or  verifying  a
    34  person from a digital image or a video frame from a video source.
    35    §  3.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
    36  have become a law.
Go to top