A06544 Summary:
BILL NO | A06544 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S07444 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Hevesi |
  | |
COSPNSR | Chandler-Waterman, Epstein, Walker |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
Amd §§783 & 784, Fam Ct Act | |
  | |
Relates to expungement of records in persons in need of supervision cases in family court. |
A06544 Actions:
BILL NO | A06544 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/14/2023 | referred to children and families | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/18/2023 | reported referred to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/25/2023 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/27/2023 | advanced to third reading cal.184 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/08/2023 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/08/2023 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/08/2023 | REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2023 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S7444 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2023 | 3RD READING CAL.1860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2023 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2023 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/29/2023 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/08/2023 | signed chap.691 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/08/2023 | approval memo.41 |
A06544 Committee Votes:
Hevesi | Aye | Byrnes | Aye | ||||||
Davila | Aye | Flood | Aye | ||||||
Vanel | Aye | Maher | Aye | ||||||
Jean-Pierre | Aye | McGowan | Aye | ||||||
Darling | Aye | Pirozzolo | Aye | ||||||
Anderson | Aye | ||||||||
Clark | Aye | ||||||||
Lunsford | Aye | ||||||||
Meeks | Aye | ||||||||
Gonzalez-Rojas | Aye | ||||||||
Mitaynes | Aye | ||||||||
Chandler-Waterm | Aye | ||||||||
Dinowitz | Aye | Morinello | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Reilly | Aye | ||||||
Cook | Aye | Mikulin | Aye | ||||||
O'Donnell | Excused | Tannousis | Aye | ||||||
Lavine | Aye | Curran | Aye | ||||||
Weprin | Aye | Angelino | Aye | ||||||
Hevesi | Aye | Flood | Aye | ||||||
Seawright | Excused | ||||||||
Rosenthal | Aye | ||||||||
Walker | Aye | ||||||||
Vanel | Aye | ||||||||
Cruz | Aye | ||||||||
Carroll | Aye | ||||||||
Simon | Aye | ||||||||
Epstein | Aye | ||||||||
Go to top
A06544 Floor Votes:
Yes
Alvarez
Yes
Carroll
Yes
Flood
Yes
Kim
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Simpson
Yes
Anderson
Yes
Chandler-Waterm
ER
Forrest
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Slater
Yes
Angelino
Yes
Chang
Yes
Friend
Yes
Lee
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Smith
Yes
Ardila
Yes
Clark
Yes
Gallagher
ER
Lemondes
Yes
Pheffer Amato
Yes
Smullen
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Colton
Yes
Gallahan
Yes
Levenberg
Yes
Pirozzolo
Yes
Solages
Yes
Barclay
Yes
Conrad
Yes
Gandolfo
Yes
Lucas
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Steck
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Cook
Yes
Gibbs
Yes
Lunsford
ER
Ra
Yes
Stern
Yes
Beephan
Yes
Cruz
Yes
Giglio JA
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Raga
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Bendett
ER
Cunningham
Yes
Giglio JM
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Rajkumar
Yes
Tague
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Curran
ER
Glick
Yes
Maher
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Tannousis
Yes
Bichotte Hermel
Yes
Darling
Yes
Gonzalez-Rojas
ER
Mamdani
Yes
Reilly
Yes
Tapia
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
Davila
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Manktelow
Yes
Reyes
Yes
Taylor
Yes
Blumencranz
Yes
De Los Santos
Yes
Gray
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Bores
Yes
DeStefano
Yes
Gunther
Yes ‡
McDonough
Yes
Rosenthal D
Yes
Vanel
Yes
Brabenec
Yes
Dickens
Yes
Hawley
Yes
McGowan
Yes
Rosenthal L
Yes
Walker
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
McMahon
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Wallace
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hunter
Yes
Meeks
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Walsh
Yes
Brook-Krasny
Yes
DiPietro
Yes
Hyndman
Yes
Mikulin
Yes
Sayegh
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Brown E
Yes
Durso
Yes
Jackson
Yes
Miller
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Brown K
Yes
Eachus
Yes
Jacobson
Yes
Mitaynes
Yes
Septimo
Yes
Williams
Yes
Burdick
Yes
Eichenstein
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
Morinello
Yes
Shimsky
Yes
Woerner
Yes
Burgos
Yes
Epstein
Yes
Jensen
Yes
Norris
Yes
Shrestha
Yes
Zaccaro
Yes ‡
Burke
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Jones
Yes
Novakhov
Yes
Sillitti
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Buttenschon
Yes
Fall
Yes
Joyner
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Simon
Yes
Zinerman
Yes
Byrnes
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kelles
Yes
Otis
Yes
Simone
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A06544 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A6544 SPONSOR: Hevesi
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the family court act, in relation to expungement of records in persons in need of supervision cases in the family court This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of the Acting Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her Family Court Advisory and Rules Committee. This measure would amend the Family Court Act ("FCA") to correct an anomaly in its provisions relating to the sealing and expungement of records in PINS cases. When Article 3 of the FCA, the juvenile delinquency ("JD").procedure statute, was enacted nearly four decades ago, applicable provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law deemed essential for due process and fairness were incorporated into it. However, the same was not done as to the remaining provisions of FCA Article 7, which thereafter would apply only to PINS cases. Among the most glaring omissions is the provision regard- ing confidentiality of records. Article 3, modeled after CPL § 160.50, which has afforded youth accused of JD, like adults accused of crimes, far more protections than those available to the subjects of PINS proceedings. Likewise, the PINS statute has not yet been modified to incorporate a 2019 amendment that provides automatic sealing of records of petty offense-level marijuana offenses, notwithstanding the fact that violations of Penal Law § 221.05 are specifically included in FCA § 712 as grounds for PINS. Professor Merril Sobie noted this disparity in his Practice Commentaries to FCA § 751:   Family Court Act Article 7, unlike Article 3   the juvenile delinquency statute, does not provide for the automatic sealing of records when a petition is dismissed or withdrawn (see Section 375.1). Hence, the records remain relatively open, subject only to the generalized, impre- cise   Family Court Act Section 166 stipulation that "  the records of any proceeding in the family court shall not be open to indiscriminate public inspection". Ironically, children who are falsely accused of non-criminal "status offense" conduct are afforded less protection than youths who are accused of engaging in criminal activities. Most recently, he has noted the ever more serious, anomalous disparity between the confidentiality protections afforded criminal records and far more limited protections afforded to both JD and PINS records: In recent years the New York Legislature has enacted criminal procedure law measures to strengthen confidentiality and to seal and expunge many records, thereby barring or limiting accessibility to less egregious criminal findings. Astonishingly, the measures have excluded the young. Today, Family Court juvenile delinquency records (crimes committed by children) and status offense records (non-criminal youthful behavior, such as truancy) are far more open and available than similar adult criminal files. few examples illustrate the dichotomy. The records of adults who have formerly been convicted of cannabis possession have been expunged (part of the legalization of marijuana). However, children below the age of 16 are excluded. See FCA § 712. Even cases where the child had been found to be innocent are never sealed remaining open together with cases where the child has been found to be guilty. Similarly, the records of a child who has been accused of illegal noncriminal behavior, such as truancy, remains unsealed indefinitely and hence widely available indef- initely. M. Sobie, "A Life Sentence for Children: NY's Antiquated Prejudicial Juvenile Justice Records Provisions," NYLJ, Dec. 16, 2021. This measure would correct that anomaly. First, closely tracking section 375.1 of the FCA and section 160.50 of the CPL, the measure would amend FCA § 783 to provide that court records in actions terminated favorably to the accused - i.e., actions diverted (diverted without petition), withdrawn or dismissed - would automatically be expunged. In light of the 2019 amendment to Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50(3) (L. 2019, c. 131), providing that convictions for petty offense-level marijuana possession under Penal Law § 221.05 are deemed to be terminations of actions in favor of the accused requiring mandatory sealing, PINS find- ings for violations of Penal Law § 221.05 would be subject to automatic expungement following the conclusion of any disposition or period of extension. Likewise, since the Federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act defines "severe forms of trafficking in persons," inter alia, as "sex trafficking in which ...the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age," the measure would require expungement at the conclusion of any disposition or extension based upon a finding for a prostitution offense under Penal Law § 230.00. Notices would be required to be sent to presentment or law enforcement agencies, if either have been involved, directing them to expunge their records as well. At the same time, recognizing that designated lead agencies for PINS diversion, that is, local departments of social services or probation departments, have certain statutory requirements for internal access to their records for limited purposes, the notices to those agencies would be for them to seal their records, thus permitting access simply for enumerated statuary purposes but barring public access. This measure authorizes designated lead diversion agencies to check their records if a juvenile returns on a subsequent PINS and, where the diversion agency is the local Department of Social Services, it may have access to its own records where necessary for service determinations and where the Commissioner determines the information is necessary to comply with Social Services Law § 422-a regarding disclosure of fatality-relat- ed information. Second, in cases in which a juvenile has been adjudicated a PINS, the juvenile would be permitted to make a motion for expungement of the record in the interests of justice at any time subsequent to the conclu- sion of the period of a disposition. If granted, notices would be sent to agencies involved in the case to seal their records. Further, youth where cases have been favorably terminated prior to the effective date of the statute would be permitted to move for expungement upon twenty days' notice. Significantly consistent with Professor Sobie's suggestion in "A Life Sentence for Children: NY's Antiquated Prejudicial Juvenile Justice Record Provisions, supra; PINS Records would be required to be automatically expunged once the juvenile reaches the age of 21, if not expunged sooner, assuming the period of any disposition has concluded. As under FCA § 375.3, the Family Court would retain its inherent author- ity to expunge, rather than simply seal, its records. See Matter of Dorothy D. v. New York City Probation Department, 49 N.Y.2d 212 (1980)(juvenile delinquency); Matter of Richard S. v. City of New York, 32 N.Y.2d 592 (1973)(PINS); Matter of Daniel PP., 224 A.D.2d 906 (3d Dept., 1996)(PINS). As the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Dorothy D. supra at 215: That the very existence of such records, despite provisions for confi- dentiality, may constitute a substantial impediment to entry into insti- tutions of higher learning, government or private employment, the armed services, or the professions, cannot be seriously questioned. For this reason, it would be antithetical to the purpose of the Family Court Act to maintain records which would not benefit society and would result in bringing unwarranted discrimination to a child's future. (Matter of Richard S. v. City of New York, 32 N.Y.2d 592, 595-596, 347 N.Y.S.2d 54, 56, 300 N.E.2d 426, 427). Many states, in fact, include expungement, not simply sealing, as their mechanism for ensuring the confidentiality of juvenile records. See, e.g.,West's Colorado Revised Statutes § 191306; Illinois Compiled Stat- utes § 405/5-915 (juvenile delinquency) and § 405/1-9 (juvenile court records other than juvenile delinquency); Ohio Revised Code §§ 2151.355, 2151.356, 2151.358 (juvenile delinquency and "unruly children" records); Revised Code of Washington § 13.50.050; Delaware Code §§ 1014-1018; North Carolina General Statutes §§ 7B-3200, 3201 (juvenile delinquency and "undisciplined" children); Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-921; Arkan- sas Code §§ 927-309  b  1  A,   b  2; West's California Code, Div. 2, C. 2, Art. 22, § 826  a; Connecticut General Statutes §§ 46b-133a,46b-146; West's Florida Statutes § 943.0582; Minnesota Statutes § 260B.235  9; Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes § 9123; West's Code of Virginia § 16-1-306. Finally, recognizing that PINS behavior consists of conduct that would not be criminal if committed by adults, this measure would amend sections 783 and 784 of the FCA to bar use of PINS records in other courts. The language in section 783, permitting use of such records in criminal sentencing proceedings, as well as the reference in section 784 to criminal courts taking action regarding police records, are vestiges of days when juvenile delinquency and PINS proceedings were both covered by Article 7 and now are more appropriately applied solely to juvenile FCA delinquency records. Indeed, these provisions have been incorporated into Article 3. See FCA §§ 381.2, 381.3(2). This measure appropriately deletes these provisions from FCA Article 7. The need to keep confidential records of juvenile misbehavior, both criminal and noncriminal in nature, has long been a central feature of the juvenile justice system. As former Chief Justice Rehnquist noted, in his concurring opinion in Smith v. Daily Mail, 443 U.S. 97, 107 (1979): It is a hallmark of our juvenile justice system in the United States that, virtually from its inception at the end of the last century, its proceedings have been conducted outside of the public's full gaze and the youths brought before our juvenile courts have been shielded from publicity. See H. Lou, Juvenile Courts in the United States 131-133 (1927); Geis, Publicity and Juvenile Court Proceedings, 30 Rocky Mt.L.Rev. 101, 102, 116 (1958). This insistence on confidentiality is born of a tender concern for the welfare of the child, to hide his youthful errors and "bury them in the graveyard of the forgotten past.'" In re Gault, 387 U. S. 1, 387 U. S. 24-25 (1967). This measure recognizes that non-criminal conduct, the gravamen of PINS cases, no less than the criminal conduct that forms the basis of juve- nile delinquency proceedings, needs the protections that have long been deemed essential to fulfilling the goals of the juvenile justice system. This measure would take effect 90 days after becoming law.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2021-22:A7621A (M/A Hevesi)   Amended on PIRdg S9391 (Sen Brisport)   Ref to Children/Families   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2019-20:A8021 (M/A. Jaffee)   Ref to Rules (OCA 46R2)   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2017-18: S4766 (Sen Avella)   Committed to Rules A7552 (M/A Jaffee)   Passed   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2015-16: S5020 (Sen Felder)   Ref to Children & Families A7049 (M/A Lupardo   Ref to Children & Families   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2014:S6814A (Sen Felder)   Committed to Rules A9916A (M/A Lupardo)   Passed
A06544 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 6544 2023-2024 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY April 14, 2023 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. HEVESI -- (at request of the Office of Court Administration) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Children and Families AN ACT to amend the family court act, in relation to expungement of records in persons in need of supervision cases in the family court The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Section 783 of the family court act is amended to read as 2 follows: 3 § 783. Use of [record] records in other court; expungement of records. 4 (a) Neither the fact that a person was before the family court under 5 this article for a hearing nor any confession, admission or statement 6 made by him or her to the court or to any officer thereof in any stage 7 of the proceeding is admissible as evidence against him or her or his or 8 her interests in any other court. [Another court, in imposing sentence9upon an adult after conviction, may receive and consider the records and10information on file with the family court concerning such person when he11was a child.] 12 (b) For purposes of this section, "expungement" shall mean that all 13 official records and papers, including judgments and orders of the 14 court, but not including public court decisions or opinions or records 15 and briefs on appeal, relating to the arrest, prosecution and court 16 proceedings and records of the probation service and designated lead 17 agency, including all duplicates or copies thereof, on file with the 18 court, police department and law enforcement agency, probation service, 19 designated lead agency and presentment agency, if any, shall be 20 destroyed and, except for records sealed as provided in paragraphs (v) 21 and (vi) of subdivision (c) of this section, shall not be made available 22 to any person or public or private agency. 23 (c) Automatic expungement of records of a proceeding under this arti- 24 cle that is terminated in favor of the respondent. (i) Upon termination EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD08943-01-3A. 6544 2 1 of a proceeding under this article in favor of the respondent, the clerk 2 of the court shall immediately notify and direct the directors of the 3 appropriate probation department, designated lead agency pursuant to 4 section seven hundred thirty-five of this article and, if a presentment 5 agency represented the petitioner in the proceeding, such agency, that 6 the proceeding has terminated in favor of the respondent and that the 7 records, if any, of such action or proceeding on file with such offices 8 shall be expunged. If the respondent had been the subject of a warrant 9 or an arrest in connection with the proceeding, or law enforcement was 10 the referring agency or petitioner pursuant to section seven hundred 11 thirty-three of this article, the notice shall also be sent to the 12 appropriate police department or law enforcement agency. Upon receipt of 13 such notification, the records shall be expunged in accordance with 14 subdivision (b) of this section. The attorney for the respondent shall 15 be notified by the clerk of the court in writing of the date and agen- 16 cies and departments to which such notifications were sent. 17 (ii) For the purposes of this section, a proceeding under this article 18 shall be considered terminated in favor of a respondent where the 19 proceeding has been: 20 (A) diverted prior to the filing of a petition pursuant to subdivision 21 (g) of section seven hundred thirty-five of this article or subsequent 22 to the filing of a petition pursuant to subdivision (b) of section seven 23 hundred forty-two of this article; or 24 (B) withdrawn or dismissed for failure to prosecute, or for any other 25 reason at any stage; or 26 (C) dismissed following an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal 27 pursuant to subdivision (a) of section seven hundred forty-nine of this 28 article; or 29 (D) resulted in an adjudication where the only finding was for a 30 violation of former section 221.05 or section 230.00 of the penal law; 31 provided, however, that with respect to findings under this paragraph, 32 the expungement required by this section shall not take place until the 33 conclusion of the period of any disposition or extension under this 34 article. 35 (iii) If, with respect to a respondent who had been the subject of a 36 warrant or an arrest in connection with the proceeding, or law enforce- 37 ment was the referring agency, the designated lead agency diverts a case 38 either prior to or subsequent to the filing of a petition under this 39 article, the designated lead agency shall notify the appropriate 40 probation service and police department or law enforcement agency in 41 writing of such diversion. Such notification may be on a form 42 prescribed by the chief administrator of the courts. Upon receipt of 43 such notification, the probation service and police department or law 44 enforcement agency shall expunge any records in accordance with subdivi- 45 sion (b) of this section in the same manner as is required thereunder 46 with respect to an order of a court. 47 (iv) If, following the referral of a proceeding under this article for 48 the filing of a petition, the petitioner or, if represented by a 49 presentment agency, such agency, elects not to file a petition under 50 this article, the petitioner or, if applicable, the presentment agency, 51 shall notify the appropriate probation service and designated lead agen- 52 cy of such determination. Such notification may be on a form prescribed 53 by the chief administrator of the courts and may be transmitted by elec- 54 tronic means. If the respondent had been the subject of a warrant or an 55 arrest in connection with the proceeding, or law enforcement was the 56 referring agency, the notification shall also be sent to the appropriateA. 6544 3 1 police department or law enforcement agency. Upon receipt of such 2 notification, the records shall be expunged in accordance with subdivi- 3 sion (b) of this section in the same manner as is required thereunder 4 with respect to an order of a court, provided, however, that the desig- 5 nated lead agency may have access to its own records in accordance with 6 paragraph (v) of this subdivision. 7 (v) Where a proceeding has been diverted pursuant to subparagraph (A) 8 of paragraph (ii) of this subdivision or where a proceeding has been 9 referred for the filing of a petition but the potential petitioner or, 10 if represented by a presentment agency, such agency, elects not to file 11 a petition in accordance with paragraph (iv) of this subdivision, the 12 designated lead agency shall seal its records under this section, but 13 shall have access to its own records solely for the following purposes: 14 (A) where there is continuing or subsequent contact with the child 15 under this article; or 16 (B) where the information is necessary for such department to deter- 17 mine what services had been arranged or provided to the family or where 18 the commissioner determines that the information is necessary in order 19 for the commissioner of such department to comply with section four 20 hundred twenty-two-a of the social services law. 21 (vi) Records expunged or sealed under this section shall be made 22 available to the juvenile or his or her agent and, where the petitioner 23 or potential petitioner is a parent or other person legally responsible 24 for the juvenile's care, such parent or other person. No statement made 25 to a designated lead agency by the juvenile or his or her parent or 26 other person legally responsible that is contained in a record expunged 27 or sealed under this section shall be admissible in any court proceed- 28 ing, except upon the consent or at the request, respectively, of the 29 juvenile or his or her parent or other person legally responsible for 30 the juvenile's care. 31 (vii) A respondent in whose favor a proceeding was terminated prior to 32 the effective date of this paragraph may, upon motion, apply to the 33 court, upon not less than twenty days notice to the petitioner or (where 34 the petitioner is represented by a presentment agency) such agency, for 35 an order granting the relief set forth in paragraph (i) of this subdivi- 36 sion. Where a proceeding under this article was terminated in favor of 37 the respondent in accordance with paragraph (iii) or (iv) of this subdi- 38 vision prior to the effective date of this paragraph, the respondent may 39 apply to the designated lead agency, petitioner or presentment agency, 40 as applicable, for a notification as described in such paragraphs grant- 41 ing the relief set forth therein and such notification shall be granted. 42 (d) Motion to expunge after an adjudication and disposition. (i) If an 43 action has resulted in an adjudication and disposition under this arti- 44 cle, the court may, in the interest of justice and upon motion of the 45 respondent, order the expungement of the records and proceedings. 46 (ii) Such motion must be in writing and may be filed at any time 47 subsequent to the conclusion of the disposition, including, but not 48 limited to, the expiration of the period of placement, suspended judg- 49 ment, order of protection or probation or any extension thereof. Notice 50 of such motion shall be served not less than eight days prior to the 51 return date of the motion upon the petitioner or, if the petitioner was 52 represented by a presentment agency, such agency. Answering affidavits 53 shall be served at least two days before the return date. 54 (iii) The court shall set forth in a written order its reasons for 55 granting or denying the motion. If the court grants the motion, all 56 court records, as well as all records in the possession of the desig-A. 6544 4 1 nated lead agency, the probation service, the presentment agency, if 2 any, and, if the respondent had been the subject of a warrant or an 3 arrest in connection with the proceeding, or if the police or law 4 enforcement agency was the referring agency or petitioner pursuant to 5 section seven hundred thirty-three of this article, the appropriate 6 police or law enforcement agency, shall be expunged in accordance with 7 subdivision (b) of this section. 8 (e) Automatic expungement of court records. All records under this 9 article shall be automatically expunged upon the respondent's twenty- 10 first birthday unless earlier expunged under this section, provided that 11 expungement under this paragraph shall not take place until the conclu- 12 sion of the period of any disposition or extension under this article. 13 (f) Expungement of court records; inherent power. Nothing contained 14 in this article shall preclude the court's use of its inherent power to 15 order the expungement of court records. 16 § 2. Section 784 of the family court act is amended to read as 17 follows: 18 § 784. Use of police records. All police records relating to the 19 arrest and disposition of any person under this article shall be kept in 20 files separate and apart from the arrests of adults and shall be with- 21 held from public inspection, but such records shall be open to 22 inspection upon good cause shown by the parent, guardian, next friend or 23 attorney of that person upon the written order of a judge of the family 24 court in the county in which the order was made [or, if the person is25subsequently convicted of a crime, of a judge of the court in which he26was convicted]. 27 § 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall 28 have become a law.
A06544 LFIN:
  | NO LFIN |
A06544 Chamber Video/Transcript:
5-8-23 | Video (@ 01:07:28) | Transcript pdf | Transcript html |