New York State Assembly

 
•  Summary 
 
•  Actions 
 
•  Committee Votes 
 
•  Floor Votes 
 
•  Memo 
 
•  Text 
 
•  LFIN 
 
•  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A06680 Summary:

A06680 Actions:

A06680 Committee Votes:

Committee:CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION   Chair:Rozic      
DATE:05/23/2023AYE/NAY:16/0  Action: Favorable refer to committee Rules        
Rozic
Aye
Mikulin
Aye
Fall
Aye
Miller
Aye
Burgos
Aye
Blumencranz
Aye
Gallagher
Aye
Beephan
Aye
Rajkumar
Aye
Maher
Aye
Forrest
Aye
Wallace
Aye
Bores
Aye
Lee
Aye
Alvarez
Aye
Simone
Aye

Committee:RULES   Chair:Pretlow      
DATE:06/05/2023AYE/NAY:28/0  Action: Favorable         
Heastie
Excused
Barclay
Aye
Weinstein
Aye
Hawley
Aye
Pretlow
Aye
Giglio
Aye
Cook
Aye
Blankenbush
Excused
Glick
Aye
Norris
Aye
Aubry
Aye
Ra
Aye
Dinowitz
Aye
Brabenec
Aye
Colton
Aye
Palmesano
Aye
Magnarelli
Aye
Reilly
Aye
Paulin
Aye
Peoples-Stokes
Aye
Benedetto
Aye
Lavine
Aye
Lupardo
Aye
Zebrowski
Aye
Thiele
Aye
Braunstein
Aye
Dickens
Aye
Davila
Aye
Hyndman
Excused
Rozic
Aye
Bronson
Aye

A06680 Floor Votes:

A06680 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
 submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)



 
BILL NUMBER: A6680
 
SPONSOR: Paulin

 
TITLE OF BILL:
 
An act to amend the general business law, in relation to prohibiting
unsolicited telemarketing sales calls during certain declared states of
emergency
 
 
PURPOSE:
 
To clarify that the prohibition on knowingly making an unsolicited tele-
marketing call applies only when the declaration of a state of emergency
includes a finding that .unsolicited calls would impair actions taken to
limit, control, or mitigate the emergency.
 
 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 1 of the bill amends section 399-z of the general business law
to clarify that the prohibition on knowingly making an, unsolicited.
telemarketing call applies only when the declaration of a state of emer-
gency includes a finding that unsolicited telemarketing calls would
impair actions taken to limit, control, or mitigate the emergency; Any
prohibition on unsolicited telemarketing calls is valid for a period of
two weeks and can be renewed for additional two-week periods upon
further findings that unsolicited telemarketing calls would impair
actions taken to limit, control, or mitigate the emergency.
 
Section 2 amends section 399-pp of the general business law to clarify
that the prohibition on knowingly making an unsolicited telemarketing
call applies only when the declaration of a state of emergency includes
a finding that unsolicited telemarketing calls would impair actions
taken to limit, control, or mitigate the emergency. Any prohibition on
unsolicited telemarketing calls is valid for a period of two weeks and
can be renewed for additional two-week periods upon further findings
that unsolicited telemarketing calls would impair actions taken to
limit, control, or mitigate the emergency.
 
Section 3 of the bill states the effective date.
 
 
JUSTIFICATION:
 
Currently, General Business Law Section 399-z (5-a) prohibits telemar-
keting calls from being made to New Yorkers who reside in locations
affected by a state of emergency declared by the Governor.  As a result,
this law has prohibited telemarketing from taking place anywhere in the
State since March 2020, because the Governor declared a statewide emer-
gency due to the Covid-19 pandemic as well as successive subsequent
statewide emergencies related to other matters.
 
When Subdivision (5-a) was enacted in 2019, it was intended to take a
targeted approach to restricting telemarketing activities during a
declared emergency, as traditionally, state of emergency disasters are
short term and geographically limited to areas that experience a public
emergency, such as a storm or public safety event, a civil disturbance
or terrorism-related activity. With respect to Covid-19 and the ensuing
gun violence emergency declaration, these states of emergency pronounce-
ments have encompassed the.entire state and have been longterm events.
 
An unforeseen consequence of this law is that an important tool utilized
by legitimate businesses to reach customers to help educate them regard-
ing products or services that may be valuable to their businesses,
employees or their own families, has been eliminated.  This bill would
correct the unanticipated consequences unleashed by the current law's
enactment by limiting the telemarketing prohibition to only emergency
declarations where it is determined that unsolicited telemarketing sales
calls would impair actions taken to limit, control, or mitigate the
emergency and explains the basis of such finding. In the event the State
determines telemarketing calls would impair such actions, this bill
would mandate such prohibition be in place for a period of two weeks.
 
The two-week review period allows businesses to move forward with their
normal business-related functions, including those encompassing telemar-
keting activities, in circumstances under which a declared state of
emergency extends beyond two weeks but problems or impairments from
unsolicited telemarketing calls have been resolved within a shortened "
period. This serves the binary goals of avoiding an unnecessary
disruption of essential business activities, while keeping a broader
state of emergency in place, if necessary.
 
 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
 
A.8662 (Cusick) of 2022, referred to consumer affairs and protection.
Same as S.7656, referred to consumer protection.
 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
 
None to the state.
 
 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.