A02672 Summary:
BILL NO | A02672B |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S01048-A |
  | |
SPONSOR | Paulin |
  | |
COSPNSR | Dinowitz, Reyes, Rosenthal L, Otis, Meeks |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
Amd 518, Gen Bus L | |
  | |
Requires sellers to clearly post the credit card price inclusive of any surcharge at the location a sale occurs; does not prohibit merchants from offering a two-tier pricing system; establishes civil penalty not to exceed $500 for each violation. |
A02672 Actions:
BILL NO | A02672B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/26/2023 | referred to consumer affairs and protection | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/12/2023 | amend and recommit to consumer affairs and protection | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/12/2023 | print number 2672a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/16/2023 | reported referred to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2023 | amend and recommit to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2023 | print number 2672b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/31/2023 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/05/2023 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/05/2023 | rules report cal.491 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/05/2023 | ordered to third reading rules cal.491 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/05/2023 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/05/2023 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/05/2023 | REFERRED TO RULES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/06/2023 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S1048A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/06/2023 | 3RD READING CAL.1450 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/06/2023 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/06/2023 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/12/2023 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/13/2023 | signed chap.723 |
A02672 Committee Votes:
Rozic | Aye | Mikulin | Aye | ||||||
Fall | Excused | Miller | Aye | ||||||
Burgos | Aye | Blumencranz | Aye | ||||||
Gallagher | Aye | Beephan | Aye | ||||||
Rajkumar | Aye | Maher | Aye | ||||||
Forrest | Aye | ||||||||
Wallace | Aye | ||||||||
Bores | Aye | ||||||||
Lee | Aye | ||||||||
Alvarez | Aye | ||||||||
Simone | Aye | ||||||||
Dinowitz | Aye | Morinello | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Reilly | Aye | ||||||
Cook | Aye | Mikulin | Aye | ||||||
O'Donnell | Excused | Tannousis | Aye | ||||||
Lavine | Aye | Curran | Aye | ||||||
Weprin | Aye | Angelino | Aye | ||||||
Hevesi | Aye | Flood | Aye | ||||||
Seawright | Aye | ||||||||
Rosenthal | Aye | ||||||||
Walker | Aye | ||||||||
Vanel | Aye | ||||||||
Cruz | Aye | ||||||||
Carroll | Aye | ||||||||
Simon | Aye | ||||||||
Epstein | Aye | ||||||||
Heastie | Excused | Barclay | Aye | ||||||
Weinstein | Aye | Hawley | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Giglio | Aye | ||||||
Cook | Aye | Blankenbush | Excused | ||||||
Glick | Aye | Norris | Aye | ||||||
Aubry | Aye | Ra | Aye | ||||||
Dinowitz | Aye | Brabenec | Aye | ||||||
Colton | Aye | Palmesano | Aye | ||||||
Magnarelli | Aye | Reilly | Aye | ||||||
Paulin | Aye | ||||||||
Peoples-Stokes | Aye | ||||||||
Benedetto | Aye | ||||||||
Lavine | Aye | ||||||||
Lupardo | Aye | ||||||||
Zebrowski | Aye | ||||||||
Thiele | Aye | ||||||||
Braunstein | Aye | ||||||||
Dickens | Aye | ||||||||
Davila | Aye | ||||||||
Hyndman | Excused | ||||||||
Rozic | Aye | ||||||||
Bronson | Aye | ||||||||
Go to top
A02672 Floor Votes:
Yes
Alvarez
Yes
Carroll
Yes
Flood
Yes
Kim
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Simpson
Yes
Anderson
Yes
Chandler-Waterm
ER
Forrest
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Slater
Yes
Angelino
Yes
Chang
Yes
Friend
Yes
Lee
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Smith
Yes
Ardila
Yes
Clark
Yes
Gallagher
Yes
Lemondes
Yes
Pheffer Amato
Yes
Smullen
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Colton
Yes
Gallahan
Yes
Levenberg
Yes
Pirozzolo
Yes
Solages
Yes
Barclay
Yes
Conrad
Yes ‡
Gandolfo
Yes
Lucas
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Steck
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Cook
Yes
Gibbs
Yes
Lunsford
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stern
Yes
Beephan
Yes
Cruz
Yes
Giglio JA
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Raga
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Bendett
ER
Cunningham
Yes
Giglio JM
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Rajkumar
Yes
Tague
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Curran
Yes
Glick
Yes
Maher
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Tannousis
Yes
Bichotte Hermel
Yes
Darling
Yes
Gonzalez-Rojas
Yes
Mamdani
Yes
Reilly
Yes
Tapia
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
Davila
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Manktelow
Yes
Reyes
Yes
Taylor
Yes
Blumencranz
Yes
De Los Santos
Yes
Gray
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Bores
Yes
DeStefano
Yes
Gunther
Yes ‡
McDonough
Yes
Rosenthal D
Yes
Vanel
Yes
Brabenec
Yes
Dickens
Yes
Hawley
Yes
McGowan
Yes
Rosenthal L
Yes
Walker
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
McMahon
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Wallace
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hunter
ER
Meeks
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Walsh
Yes
Brook-Krasny
Yes
DiPietro
Yes ‡
Hyndman
Yes
Mikulin
Yes
Sayegh
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Brown E
Yes
Durso
Yes
Jackson
Yes
Miller
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Brown K
Yes
Eachus
Yes
Jacobson
Yes
Mitaynes
Yes
Septimo
Yes
Williams
Yes
Burdick
Yes
Eichenstein
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
Morinello
Yes
Shimsky
Yes
Woerner
ER
Burgos
Yes
Epstein
Yes
Jensen
Yes
Norris
Yes
Shrestha
Yes
Zaccaro
Yes
Burke
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Jones
Yes
Novakhov
Yes
Sillitti
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Buttenschon
Yes
Fall
Yes
Joyner
ER
O'Donnell
Yes
Simon
Yes
Zinerman
Yes
Byrnes
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kelles
Yes
Otis
Yes
Simone
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A02672 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A2672B SPONSOR: Paulin
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law, in relation to requiring sell- ers to clearly post the price of a credit card surcharge   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To clarify that sellers, may impose a surcharge on customers who pay by credit card, so long as the seller clearly posts the credit card price, inclusive of the surcharge, and as long as the final sales price does not amount to a price that is higher than the posted price.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section one amends section 518 of the General Business Law to provide that no seller .in any sales transaction may impose a surcharge on a holder who elects to use a credit card,in lieu of payment by cash, check, or similar means unless such seller clearly posts the credit card price, inclusive of such surcharge and provided further that the final sales price of any such sales transaction, inclusive of surcharge, shall not amount to a price greater than the posted price for such sales tran- saction.   JUSTIFICATION: In 2018, the New York Court of Appeals heard a challenge to section 518 of the General Business Law (GBL), which provides that merchants may not impose a surcharge on a customer who pays by credit card. The Court ruled that the statute as it reads is incorrect and that merchants may in fact charge a surcharge to customers paying by credit card. Sellers do not run afoul of the statute; so long as they post the total dollars and cents price that customers will be charged (See Expressions Hair Design, et al. v. Schneiderman, 32 N.Y. 3d 382, 2018). This means that the total price, inclusive of the surcharge, must be clearly presented to the customer. The Court noted that the type of surcharge that is expressly prohibited by GBL § 518 is posting a,cash price and stating that the credit price is the cash price, plus an additional percentage; for example, adding a 3% charge for a credit transaction. Per the Court, customers must not be expected to do the math to figure out the total price that they will be paying. This legislation provides much needed clarification to GBL § 518, by codifying the Court's ruling in Expressions Hair Design. The bill amends this section of law by providing that merchants may not impose a surcharge on customers paying by credit card, unless they clearly post the credit card price, inclusive of the surcharge, and as long as the final price ofthe transaction, including the surcharge, does not amount to a price that is higher than the posted price. This bill is necessary to prevent consumers from being misled when making a purchase using their credits cards.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A.9679 of 2021 and 2022, referred, to consumer affairs and protection / S.8774 referred to consumer protection   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.
A02672 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 2672--B 2023-2024 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY January 26, 2023 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. PAULIN, DINOWITZ, REYES -- read once and referred to the Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported and referred to the Committee on Codes -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to requiring sell- ers to clearly post the price of a credit card surcharge The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Section 518 of the general business law, as added by chap- 2 ter 160 of the laws of 1984, is amended to read as follows: 3 § 518. 1. Credit card surcharge [prohibited] notice requirement. [No] 4 Any seller in any sales transaction [may impose] imposing a surcharge on 5 a [holder] customer who elects to use a credit card in lieu of payment 6 by cash, check, or similar means shall clearly and conspicuously post 7 the total price for using a credit card in such transaction, inclusive 8 of surcharge, provided however, any such surcharge may not exceed the 9 amount of the surcharge charged to the business by the credit card 10 company for such credit card use. The final sales price of any such 11 sales transaction, inclusive of such surcharge, shall not amount to a 12 price greater than the posted price for such sales transaction. Nothing 13 in this subdivision shall be deemed to prohibit merchants from offering 14 a two-tier pricing system. For the purposes of this section, "two-tier 15 pricing system" shall mean the tagging or posting of two different pric- 16 es in which the credit card price, inclusive of any surcharge, is posted 17 alongside the cash price. 18 2. Any seller who violates the provisions of this section shall be 19 [guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine] liable for a civil penal- 20 ty, recoverable in an action or proceeding brought in a court of compe- 21 tent jurisdiction not to exceed five hundred dollars [or a term ofEXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD02683-06-3A. 2672--B 2 1imprisonment up to one year, or both] for each such violation. The 2 provisions of this subdivision may be enforced concurrently by the 3 director or commissioner of a municipal consumer affairs office, or by 4 the town attorney, city corporation counsel, or other lawful designee of 5 a municipality or local government, and all moneys collected thereunder 6 shall be retained by such municipality or local government. 7 § 2. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall 8 have become a law.
A02672 LFIN:
  | NO LFIN |
A02672 Chamber Video/Transcript:
6-5-23 | Video (@ 01:54:07) | Transcript pdf | Transcript html |