A04204 Summary:
BILL NO | A04204 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S04037 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Weprin (MS) |
  | |
COSPNSR | Cahill, Paulin, Ramos, Miller MG, Quart, Aubry, Seawright, Barron, Vanel, Hevesi, Eichenstein, Rosenthal D, Fernandez, Mosley, Hyndman, Ortiz, Pichardo, Sayegh, Fall |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | Abbate, Braunstein, Colton, Cook, Davila, Lavine, Perry, Rivera, Solages |
  | |
Amd §296, Exec L | |
  | |
Prohibits discrimination against religious attire and appurtenances thereto, including facial hair. |
A04204 Actions:
BILL NO | A04204 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2019 | referred to governmental operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | reported referred to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | rules report cal.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | ordered to third reading rules cal.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/27/2019 | REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/09/2019 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S4037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/09/2019 | 3RD READING CAL.272 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/09/2019 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/09/2019 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08/09/2019 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08/09/2019 | signed chap.154 |
A04204 Committee Votes:
Titus | Aye | Johns | Aye | ||||||
Galef | Aye | Goodell | Aye | ||||||
Glick | Aye | Lalor | Aye | ||||||
McDonald | Aye | Byrne | Aye | ||||||
Buchwald | Aye | ||||||||
Bichotte | Excused | ||||||||
Stirpe | Aye | ||||||||
Hyndman | Aye | ||||||||
Williams | Aye | ||||||||
Epstein | Aye | ||||||||
Lentol | Aye | Ra | Aye | ||||||
Schimminger | Aye | Giglio | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Montesano | Aye | ||||||
Cook | Aye | Morinello | Aye | ||||||
Cymbrowitz | Aye | Palumbo | Aye | ||||||
O'Donnell | Absent | Garbarino | Aye | ||||||
Lavine | Aye | ||||||||
Perry | Aye | ||||||||
Zebrowski | Aye | ||||||||
Abinanti | Aye | ||||||||
Weprin | Aye | ||||||||
Mosley | Aye | ||||||||
Hevesi | Aye | ||||||||
Fahy | Aye | ||||||||
Seawright | Aye | ||||||||
Rosenthal | Aye | ||||||||
Heastie | Aye | Kolb | Aye | ||||||
Gottfried | Aye | Crouch | Aye | ||||||
Lentol | Aye | Finch | Aye | ||||||
Gantt | Excused | Barclay | Aye | ||||||
Nolan | Aye | Raia | Aye | ||||||
Weinstein | Aye | Hawley | Excused | ||||||
Ortiz | Aye | Giglio | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Malliotakis | Aye | ||||||
Cook | Aye | ||||||||
Glick | Aye | ||||||||
Aubry | Aye | ||||||||
Englebright | Aye | ||||||||
Dinowitz | Aye | ||||||||
Colton | Aye | ||||||||
Magnarelli | Aye | ||||||||
Perry | Aye | ||||||||
Paulin | Aye | ||||||||
Titus | Excused | ||||||||
Peoples-Stokes | Aye | ||||||||
Benedetto | Aye | ||||||||
Lavine | Aye | ||||||||
Lupardo | Aye | ||||||||
Zebrowski | Excused | ||||||||
Go to top
A04204 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Crespo
ER
Gantt
Yes
LiPetri
Yes
Perry
Yes
Simon
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Pheffer Amato
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Cruz
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Smith
Yes
Ashby
Yes
Cusick
Yes
Glick
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Smullen
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Manktelow
Yes
Quart
Yes
Solages
Yes
Barclay
Yes
Davila
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stec
Yes
Barnwell
Yes
De La Rosa
Yes
Griffin
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Raia
Yes
Steck
Yes
Barrett
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Gunther
Yes
McMahon
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Stern
Yes
Barron
Yes
DeStefano
ER
Hawley
Yes
Mikulin
Yes
Raynor
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Dickens
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Miller B
Yes
Reilly
ER
Tague
ER
Bichotte
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Hunter
Yes
Miller MG
Yes
Reyes
Yes
Taylor
ER
Blake
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hyndman
ER
Miller ML
Yes
Richardson
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Blankenbush
No
DiPietro
Yes
Jacobson
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Titus
Yes
Brabenec
ER
D'Urso
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
Morinello
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Vanel
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Eichenstein
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Romeo
Yes
Walczyk
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Johns
Yes
Niou
Yes
Rosenthal D
Yes
Walker
Yes
Buchwald
Yes
Epstein
Yes
Jones
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Rosenthal L
Yes
Wallace
Yes
Burke
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Joyner
Yes
Norris
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Walsh
Yes
Buttenschon
Yes
Fall
Yes
Kim
ER
O'Donnell
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Byrne
Yes
Fernandez
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Salka
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Byrnes
Yes
Finch
Yes
Lalor
Yes
Otis
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Williams
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Sayegh
Yes
Woerner
Yes
Carroll
No
Friend
Yes
Lawrence
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Wright
Yes
Colton
Yes
Frontus
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Schmitt
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Cook
Yes
Galef
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A04204 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A4204 SPONSOR: Weprin (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting discrimi- nation against religious attire   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This bill would clarify that the wearing of any attire, clothing, or facial hair in accordance with`the requirements of his or her religion is protected under the Human Rights Law.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section one of the bill would clarify that it is an unlawful discrimina- tory practice for an employer to require a person to violate or forego the wearing attire, clothing, or facial hair in accordance with the requirements of his or her religion unless the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably accommodate the person's religious prac- tice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business. Section two sets an effective date after sixty days.   JUSTIFICATION: This bill is intended to protect the religious rights of all New York- ers. An example of the need for this bill is a case in New York City where a member of the Sikh religion, who worked for the MTA, was ordered to remove his turban and wear the MTA hat When he objected, on religious grounds, the MTA responded that he may wear the turban if he affixes an MTA badge to the front. This was unacceptable as wearing a turban is a solemn religious duty for Sikhs and affixing a badge to it would not be religiously proper. This bill would ensure that persons, like the gentleman described above, no longer be discriminated against at their places of work because of their expression of religious duties.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:t 03/22/17 passed assembly 03/20/18 passed assembly   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become law.
A04204 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 4204 2019-2020 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY February 1, 2019 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. WEPRIN, CAHILL, PAULIN, RAMOS, M. G. MILLER, QUART, AUBRY, SEAWRIGHT, BARRON, VANEL, HEVESI -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. ABBATE, BRAUNSTEIN, COLTON, COOK, DAVILA, LAVINE, MOSLEY, ORTIZ, PERRY, RIVERA, SOLAGES -- read once and referred to the Commit- tee on Governmental Operations AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting discrimi- nation against religious attire The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 10 of section 296 of the exec- 2 utive law, as amended by chapter 539 of the laws of 2002, is amended to 3 read as follows: 4 (a) It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer, 5 or an employee or agent thereof, to impose upon a person as a condition 6 of obtaining or retaining employment, including opportunities for 7 promotion, advancement or transfers, any terms or conditions that would 8 require such person to violate or forego a sincerely held practice of 9 his or her religion, including but not limited to the observance of any 10 particular day or days or any portion thereof as a sabbath or other holy 11 day in accordance with the requirements of his or her religion or the 12 wearing of any attire, clothing, or facial hair in accordance with the 13 requirements of his or her religion, unless, after engaging in a bona 14 fide effort, the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably 15 accommodate the employee's or prospective employee's sincerely held 16 religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct 17 of the employer's business. Notwithstanding any other provision of law 18 to the contrary, an employee shall not be entitled to premium wages or 19 premium benefits for work performed during hours to which such premium 20 wages or premium benefits would ordinarily be applicable, if the employ- 21 ee is working during such hours only as an accommodation to his or her 22 sincerely held religious requirements. Nothing in this paragraph or EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD07506-01-9A. 4204 2 1 paragraph (b) of this subdivision shall alter or abridge the rights 2 granted to an employee concerning the payment of wages or privileges of 3 seniority accruing to that employee. 4 § 2. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall 5 have become a law.
A04204 LFIN:
  | NO LFIN |
A04204 Chamber Video/Transcript:
2-27-19 | Video (@ 01:01:49) | Transcript pdf | Transcript html |