A06425 Summary:
BILL NO | A06425A |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S07114-A |
  | |
SPONSOR | O'Donnell |
  | |
COSPNSR | Paulin, Lunsford, Lavine, Weprin, Simon, Burdick, Davila, Stern, Sillitti, Simone, Shimsky, Dickens, DeStefano, Lemondes, McDonough, Jacobson, Steck, Meeks, Hevesi, Lupardo, Reyes, McDonald, Gallahan, Gray, Beephan, Solages, Glick, Maher, Magnarelli, Hyndman, Bores |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
Amd §§3216, 3221 & 4303, Ins L | |
  | |
Requires health insurance plans to provide coverage for epinephrine auto-injector devices; caps the cost to an insured at $100 per year. |
A06425 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A6425A SPONSOR: O'Donnell
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to requiring health insurance plans to provide coverage for epinephrine auto-injector devices   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To require insurance coverage for epinephrine auto-injectors ("epi- pens") and set an annual cost-sharing cap.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends Insurance Law Section 3216, Subsection (i) by adding paragraph 39, which: (A) requires all New York insurance plans which issue accident and health insurance policies to provide coverage for at-minimum two medi- cally-necessary epinephrine auto-injector devices at an out-of-pocket cost not exceeding $100 annually, AND (B) specifies that "epinephrine auto-injector device" will have the same definition as that which is stated in Public Health Law Section 3000-C, Subdivision, paragraph (b). Section 2 amends Insurance Law Section 3221, Subsection (k) by adding paragraph 23, which: (A) requires all New York insurance plans which issue group or blanket accident or health insurance policies (which include coverage for physi- cian services in a physician's office) to provide coverage for at-mini- mum two medically-necessary epinephrine auto-injector devices at an out-of-pocket cost not exceeding $100 annually. Further clarifies that if, under 26 USC 223, application of this requirement would result in health savings account (HSA) ineligibility, the requirement shall apply to HSA-qualified high-deductible health plans only after the enrollee has satisfied the minimum deductible outlined in USC 223(c)(2)(C), AND (B) specifies that "epinephrine auto-injector device" will have the same definition as that which is stated in Public Health Law Section 3000-C, Subdivision, paragraph (b). Section 3 amends Insurance Law Section 4303 by adding a subsection (vv), which: (A) requires all New York medical expense indemnity corporations, hospi- tal service corporations, and health service corporations (which include coverage for physician services in a physician's office) to provide coverage for at-minimum two medically-necessary epinephrine auto-injec- tor devices at an out-of-pocket cost not exceeding $100 annually. Further clarifies that if, under 26 USC 223, application of this requirement would result in health savings account (HSA) ineligibility, the requirement shall apply to HSA-qualified high-deductible health plans only after the enrollee has satisfied the minimum deductible outlined ln USC 223(c)(2)(C), AND (B) specifies that "epinephrine auto-injector device" will have the same 'definition as that which ts stated in Public Health Law Section 3000-C, Subdivision, paragraph (b). Section 4 provides the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: The rising cost of an epinephrine auto-injector device (commonly known by the brand name "epi-pen") has far outpaced inflation in the last 15 years. Without mandated insurance coverage and a reasonable cost-sharing cap, the accessibility of these life-saving devices is beyond the means of millions of New Yorkers. Separate studies by NIH and Blue Cross Blue Shield indicated a strong correlation between skyrocketing epi-pen prices, and the number of emer- gency room visits by children having serious anaphylactic reactions. An epinephrine auto-injector significantly mitigates the risk of death from a serious allergic reaction. In 2010, the most common price for a two-pack of epi-pens was approxi- mately $100. Today, the generic version will almost always cost upwards of $350 and the brand name can cost upwards of $700. Far too many New Yorkers are now forced to decide whether they will spend hundreds 'of dollars per year on a device which they hope to never need to use. Financial means should not be a barrier to life-saving medicine.