•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A11017 Summary:

BILL NOA11017
 
SAME ASSAME AS S03284
 
SPONSORSolages
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §862, Gen Muni L
 
Prohibits industrial development agencies from incentivizing movements within the state where any plant, facility, or personnel of the project occupant are abandoned or removed.
Go to top    

A11017 Actions:

BILL NOA11017
 
04/21/2026referred to local governments
Go to top

A11017 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A11017
 
SPONSOR: Solages
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general municipal law, in relation to prohibiting industrial development agencies from incentivizing movements within the state   PURPOSE: The bill would tighten existing prohibitions on so-called "intra-state piracy" that restrict local industrial development agencies from giving financial assistance to a company to lure it from one part of New York to another.   SUMMARY: Section 1: Amends subdivision 1 of section 862 of the general municipal law to tighten the existing prohibition on IDAs giving assistance to projects that simply move jobs or facilities from one part of the state to another. Section 2: Sets Effective Date.   JUSTIFICATION: The purpose of IDAs is to incentivize companies to locate in the county or municipality of the IDA through offering financial assistance through tax incentives, payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreements, and other means. To avoid one municipality using incentives to "pirate" a company from another part of New York, IDAs are prohibited from using their funds to incentivize an "industrial or manufacturing plant" moving from one part of New York to another. Unfortunately, the existing statute contains exceptions that are so broad and vague as to render the prohi- bition virtually meaningless, and intra-state "piracy" occurs with regu- larity. For example, in February 2019, the Westchester County IDA grant- ed financial assistance to a business that closed its facility in Yonkers, shipped some jobs out of state, and moved other jobs to a new facility in Rye Brook, another community in Westchester County. Simply moving jobs from one part of New York to another does not benefit state residents and should not be encouraged by taxpayer-funded subsidies.   RACIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: TBD   GENDER JUSTICE IMPACT: TBD   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: Senate 2019: S4674, Referred to Local Government 2020: S4674, Referred to Local Government 2021: S1656A, Passed Senate 2022: S1656A, Passed Senate 2023: S1240, Referred to Local Government 2024: S1240, Referred to Local Government Assembly 2019: A7200, Referred to Local Governments 2020: A7200, Referred to Local Governments 2021: A6993A, Reported and Referred to Ways and Means 2022: A6993A, Reported to Ways and Means 2023: A1485, Referred to Local Governments 2024: A1485, Referred to Local Governments   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately
Go to top

A11017 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          11017
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                     April 21, 2026
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by M. of A. SOLAGES -- read once and referred to the Commit-
          tee on Local Governments
 
        AN ACT to amend the general municipal law, in  relation  to  prohibiting
          industrial  development  agencies  from incentivizing movements within
          the state
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section  1. Subdivision 1 of section 862 of the general municipal law,
     2  as amended by section 1 of part J of chapter 59 of the laws of 2013,  is
     3  amended to read as follows:
     4    (1)  No funds of the agency shall be used in respect of any project if
     5  the completion thereof would result in the removal of [an industrial  or
     6  manufacturing]  any plant, facility or personnel of the project occupant
     7  from one area of the state to another area of the  state  [or],  in  the
     8  abandonment  of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant
     9  located within the state  or  the  unemployment  or  relocation  of  any
    10  personnel  who  are employed by the project occupant, provided, however,
    11  that neither restriction shall apply if the agency  shall  determine  on
    12  the  basis  of  the application before it that the project is reasonably
    13  necessary to discourage the project occupant from  removing  such  other
    14  plant  or  facility  to  a  location  outside the state or is reasonably
    15  necessary to preserve the competitive position of the  project  occupant
    16  in  its  respective  industry  due  to  physical,  zoning, or logistical
    17  constraints at such project occupant's existing site within the state.
    18    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD04755-01-5
Go to top