A02371 Summary:

BILL NOA02371
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORPaulin
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§3216, 3221 & 4303, Ins L; amd §4406, Pub Health L; amd §162, Civ Serv L; amd §364-j, Soc Serv L
 
Requires contracts for insurance and medical assistance to provide value-based care for maternity coverage; defines value-based care as an arrangement that financially rewards certain positive outcomes and financially penalizes certain negative outcomes.
Go to top    

A02371 Actions:

BILL NOA02371
 
01/16/2025referred to insurance
Go to top

A02371 Committee Votes:

Go to top

A02371 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A2371
 
SPONSOR: Paulin
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the insurance law, the public health law, the civil service law and the social services law, in relation to value-based care for maternity coverage   PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to require all types of health insurance to enter value-based arrangements for maternity coverage for at least nine- ty five percent of the maternity cases of each insurer.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 adds a new subparagraph c to paragraph 10 of subsection (i) of section 3216 of the insurance law to define "value-based arrangement". It also further defines a negative outcome as a c- section on a low risk individual. Section 2 add an amendment to paragraph 5 of subsection (k) of section 3221 of the insurance law to define "value-based arrangement". It also further defines a negative outcome as a c-section on a low risk individ- ual Section 3 amends paragraph 1 of subsection c of section 4303 of the insurance law to add a new subparagraph d which defines "value-based arrangement". It also further defines a negative outcome as a c-section on a low risk individual Section 4 adds a new subdivision 6 of section 4406 of the public health law to require a health maintenance organization reimburse and pay for maternity care through a value-based arrangement. It also defines a "value-based arrangement." It further defines a negative outcome as a c-section on a low-risk individual. Sections 5 add as new subdivision 10 to section 162 of the civil service law to require any contract entered into for maternity care be organized and paid for through a value-based arrangement. It also which defines a "value-based arrangement". It further defines a negative outcome as a c-section on a low risk individual Section 6 establishes the effective date. Such effective date shall be 45 days after enactment.   JUSTIFICATION: Since the 1970s, the c-section rate in this country has increased by 500 percent, where 1 in 3 babies are born via c-section today. Despite this growing trend, research demonstrates there is no evidence that cesarean births provide any benefit to the mother or newborn when the procedure is not required, in fact, it is quite the opposite. Currently, the c-section rate in New York State is approximately 34.1 percent, which slightly exceeds the national average and greatly exceeds the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) ideal rate of 10-15 percent. Importantly, cesarean birth rates vary greatly across hospitals, ranging between 7% and 70% depending on what hospital a birthing person goes to. Studies have found that cesarean birth rates in hospitals are directly linked to higher maternal death rates and higher costs for healthcare. The increase in cesarean rates in the U.S. is linked to an increase in maternal deaths overall as the procedure can lead to neonatal respir- atory problems and maternal health complications. In fact, cesareans can account for three of the top six leading causes of maternal mortality -hemorrhage, complications of anesthesia, and infection. Additionally, there is an alarming disparity in cesarean birth rates among different birthing populations. Black birthing people are more likely to receive a cesarean overall and they are also more likely to undergo repeated cesareans compared to other birthing people, which further increases the risk of mortality. In fact, in the U.S., black birthing people are 4 times more likely to die from pregnancy-related complications than white birthing people. In 2023, America's Health Rankings (AHR) reported that of the 50 states, New York is ranked 49th for the highest rate of low-risk c-sections. A cesarean delivery is considered "low-risk" if a single infant is deliv- ered headfirst at full term to a mother who has not given birth before. AHR further reported that between 2019 and 2021, the rate of low-risk cesarean delivery increased 6 percent in NYS and only 3 percent nationally. Low-risk cesarean deliveries were higher among Black birth- ing people. With the rate of c-sections steadily rising in New York State over the last several years, more needs to be done to reverse this trend. Value-based arrangements have the potential to reduce the number of medically unnecessary procedures, like c-sections, and the negative health outcomes that often follow. Value-based arrangements reward health care providers with incentive payments for the quality of care they give to people, not the quantity. This bill would define a "value-based arrangement" as an arrangement that financially rewards certain positive health outcomes and financial- ly penalizes certain negative outcomes, where a negative outcome includes performing a c-section on a low-risk individual. The bill further requires every type of insurance to enter into a value-based arrangement with hospitals, FQHCs providing maternity services, and birthing centers in the state. By December 2025, each insurer and hospi- tal and/or birthing center shall enter value-based arrangements with eight five percent of the insurer's maternity cases, increasing to nine- ty-five percent of the insurer's maternity cases by December 31, 2026. For some birthing people, a c-section is the best and safest option for both the mother and the baby. However, the rate of low-risk c-sections performed in New York is inexplainable and when compounded with the negative maternal health outcomes we see in this state, the rate of this procedure is inexcusable.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A.9249. of 2024, referred to /insurance /Same as S. 9013 of 2024, referred to insurance.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the forty-fifth day after it shall have become a law.
Go to top