•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A03603 Summary:

BILL NOA03603
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORPretlow
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§740 & 741, Lab L; amd §75-b, Civ Serv L
 
Enacts provisions providing protection to employees from retaliatory actions by employers where such employees report improper business activities; applicable to employees who in good faith reasonably believe that an improper business activity has or will occur, based on information that the employees reasonably believe to be true; provides remedies and relief.
Go to top    

A03603 Actions:

BILL NOA03603
 
02/03/2023referred to labor
01/03/2024referred to labor
Go to top

A03603 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A3603
 
SPONSOR: Pretlow
  PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This bill would prohibit certain adverse personnel actions by public employers taken against public employees when they report improper events or activities.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: This bill would amend sections 740 and 741 of the labor law, and section 75-b of the civil service law to: offer the following necessary changes to the current legislation: *The bill strengthens the protections afforded employees by prohibiting retaliatory action for disclosing or refusing to participate in "improp- er governmental action." Improper governmental action is defined as any practice, procedure, action or failure to act by an employer that violates any law, rule or regulation, expanding the definition of employer misconduct beyond that which would present a substantial and significant threat to the public health and safety *The bill eliminates the notice requirement, so that employees are no longer required to bring the misconduct in question to the attention of their employer prior to reporting such misconduct to an outside source. The Supreme Court has held that such internal communications are not protected under the First Amendment. See Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. (2006). In addition, the notice requirement allowed employers to cover their tracks while preparing a dossier against the reporting employee. *The bill increases the civil penalty allowed in such whistle blower claims t6 $30,000. *The bill eliminates the right of the employer to seek attorney's fees for those claims to be determined to be made without a reasonable basis.   JUSTIFICATION: This bill would expand the current whistle blower protections under Sections 740 and 741 of the Labor Law and Section 75-b of the Civil Service Law. Currently, the whistle blower protections afforded under these statutes is overly narrow in scope, merely protecting employees who are reporting employer misconduct that threatens the general public health and safety. The corporate scandals that rocked the business community in the early part of this decade demonstrate the vital need for broad whistle blower protections The narrow scope of these statutes deprives them of any true meaning or effect. As a result, this much needed legislation finally offers adequate protection to those brave employees who refuse to sacri- fice their own integrity in the face of employer intimidation.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2022 01/05/22 referred to labor 2019-2020 A3863 referred to labor 2017-2018 A3893 referred to labor 2015-16 A2889 referred to labor 2013-14 A4148 referred to labor A4468 2009/2C10 held for consideration in Labor A.8405 (2007-2008)   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: See fiscal note.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act would take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have
Go to top