-  This bill is not active in this session.
 
     
  •  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A05295 Summary:

BILL NOA05295
 
SAME ASSAME AS S05640
 
SPONSORBores
 
COSPNSRAubry, Hyndman, Darling, Dinowitz, Glick, McDonald, Simone, Simon, Hevesi, Tapia, Jacobson, Reyes, Alvarez, Rosenthal D, Gibbs, Cruz, Steck, Zinerman, Rozic, Taylor, Bronson, Sillitti, Burgos, Colton, Lucas, Brabenec, Carroll, Lee
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §203-f, Lab L
 
Provides that employment provisions that require an employee to assign certain inventions that are made on the employee's own time and which do not use the employer's equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information shall be unenforceable.
Go to top

A05295 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A5295
 
SPONSOR: Bores
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the labor law, in relation to inventions made by employ- ees   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: Amends the labor law by adding a new section 203-f which specifies that IP/an invention developed entirely on an employee's own time, without :trade secrets, belongs to the employee.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amens the labor law to add a section 203-f. This amendment renders any employment agreement unenforceable if it requires employees to assign the rights to inventions developed using the employee's own property and time. It specifies exemption for IP created with actual or demonstrably anticipated research of the employer, or from work performed by the employee in the course of their work for the employer.   JUSTIFICATION: Overly broad contracts can rob employees of their intellectual property. Research has shown that stronger IP protections for workers both protect employees' and increase incentives for innovation. Moreover, economists have linked better IP protection for employees to more efficient firms and increased economic growth. The reasons are clear; these clauses prevent employees from trying new ideas that can one day turn into new businesses. Other employees leave for jurisdictions with these protections, like California. California implemented this protection in 2011, and it has not impeded the growth of its tech secLor. This law brings overdue protections to New Yorkers.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: This is a new bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top