•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A08250 Summary:

BILL NOA08250A
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORKelles
 
COSPNSRGallagher, Ardila, Davila
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd 23-2711 & 23-2715, En Con L; amd 81, Pub Lds L
 
Relates to permits and financial security for reclamation for salt mining beneath a lake; requires such permits to be subject to environmental quality review procedures; requires financial security to cover any damages directly or indirectly resulting from salt mining activities beneath a lake, including, but not limited to, those resulting from collapse or water contamination.
Go to top

A08250 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A8250A
 
SPONSOR: Kelles
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the environmental conservation law and the public lands law, in relation to permits and financial security for reclamation for salt mining beneath a lake   PURPOSE: Relates to permits and financial security for reclamation for salt mining beneath a lake   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Sec. 1- amends subdivisions 11 and 12 of section 23-2711 of the environ- mental conservation law and adds new subdivisions 11-a and 14. to add requirements to the permit renewal process for projects that allow salt mining beneath a lake. Sec. 2 - amends subdivision 6 of section 23-2715 of the environmental conservation law regarding the required financial security for reclama- tion for projects that include salt mining beneath a lake. Sec. 3 - adds a new subdivision 3 to section 81 of the public lands law that requires the duration of such permit, consent or lease from New York State with respect to salt mining beneath a lake be tied to the duration of the permit issued by the department of environmental conser- vation pursuant to title 27 of article 23 of the environmental conserva- tion law. Sec. 4 - adds a severability clause. Sec. 5 - adds the effective date.   NEW PROVISIONS ADDED BY THE A-PRINT: *adds to section 1 language clarifying that the updated reclamation plan required as a condition of permit renewal shall be of surface and subsurface affected land; *adds a requirement for a 30-year monitoring plan as a condition of permit renewal.   JUSTIFICATION: In August of 2023, Cargill, Inc. began the process of putting up for sale the Cayuga Salt Mine (CSM) it has operated for more than five (5) decades beneath Cayuga Lake in Lansing, NY in Tompkins County, where it operates on several thousand acres of land it leases from New York State. While the Mine Safety and Health Administration has been able to inspect the CSM operation for worker safety, the state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has not regularly inspected the mine for issues related to protecting the Cayuga Lake ecosystem. Now, after decades of mining by Cargill, Cayuga Lake is saltier than nearly all the other Finger Lakes. Further, due to continued mining and geologic condi- tions, without intervention from the DEC to require an environmental review, the lake is at risk of becoming permanently more saline. NYS public lands law authorizes the state Office of General Services (OGS) to grant the use of state-owned lands for mining purposes, includ- ing those lands found beneath lakes. Since the mid 1970s, OGS has provided consent orders to the CSM owner, Cargill, to allow for salt mining under Cayuga Lake. The most recent consent order in 2019 provided that Cargill would be able to provide notice to OGS and then extend the consent order for ten years. This was done without the performance of an environmental impact statement (EIS) or environmental quality review (SEAR) under the New York State Department of Environmental Conserva- tion. DEC is also responsible for providing additional permitting through the Mined Land Reclamation Law, that includes reclamation and closure requirements of mined lands. Past civil lawsuits challenging the contin- uance of mining permits by the DEC have been dismissed. The assertions made in these lawsuits centered on the lack of DEC oversight or the requirement of an EIS on the mine in light of significant environmental issues with the Retsof salt mine in Livingston County, which, in 1994, collapsed and flooded, causing two sinkholes, significant subsidence damage, wells going dry, and the salinization of a freshwater aquifer. The geological similarities of these two mines has the communities surrounding Cayuga lake and its watershed justifiably concerned about the significant environmental and ecological risks of mine collapse. Cayuga Lake and its watershed is the largest in the region spanning seven (7) counties, covering 860 square miles with more than 140 streams that flow into the lake. Cayuga Lake itself is surrounded by a multitude of communities and supports a tourist economy seeking the natural beauty of the lake and the opportunity to visit the many vineyards found along the Cayuga Lake Wine Trail. An accident within the salt mine below Cayu- ga Lake could have an immediate and severe impact, reducing the quality of the drinking water of about 100,000 residents and endangering the region's $3 billion, 60,000-employee food, wine and recreational tourism economy. Despite an EIS being fully warranted by the scope of the environmental risk posed by salt mining under a lake, the DEC, has, for decades, not required the owners of Cayuga Salt Mine to cooperate with an EIS proc- ess, despite repeated requests to do so.This legislation would bolster existing protections by explicitly requiring an environmental impact statement for mining under a lake where there has not been one for the preceding 20 years, as well as an updated reclamation plan along with appropriate financial security to ensure the communities relying on Cayuga Lake and its watershed are protected from potential harm.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to state.   EFFECTIVE DATE: on the 30th day, provided that sec. 2 of the bill shall take effect on the 90th day. Effective immediately, the addition, amendment and or repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such effective date.
Go to top