A08590 Summary:
BILL NO | A08590 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S05884 |
  | |
SPONSOR | O'Donnell (MS) |
  | |
COSPNSR | Gottfried, Glick, Hoyt, Wright, Hevesi, Kavanagh, Lopez V, Lifton, Bing, Paulin, Millman, Rivera N, Rosenthal, Alessi, Rivera J, Benedetto, Brodsky, Ortiz, Cahill, Cook, Dinowitz, Diaz L, Eddington, Jeffries, Sayward, John, Brennan, Fields, Jaffee, Lafayette, Peralta, Lancman, Lavine, Weprin, Zebrowski K, Titone, Lentol, Kellner, Nolan |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | Aubry, Boyland, Bradley, Englebright, Farrell, Gianaris, Latimer, Lupardo, McEneny, Pretlow, Ramos, Schimel, Sweeney, Towns, Weisenberg, Young |
  | |
Add S10-a, amd SS13 & 11, Dom Rel L | |
  | |
Relates to individuals ability to marry. |
A08590 Actions:
BILL NO | A08590 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/21/2007 | referred to judiciary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/18/2007 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2007 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2007 | rules report cal.572 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2007 | ordered to third reading rules cal.572 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2007 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2007 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2007 | REFERRED TO RULES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/09/2008 | DIED IN SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/09/2008 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/09/2008 | ordered to third reading cal.592 |
A08590 Floor Votes:
No
Abbate
Yes
Carrozza
No
Galef
No
Kolb
No
Oaks
Yes
Scarborough
Yes
Alessi
No
Christensen
No
Gantt
Yes
Koon
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Schimel
No
Alfano
No
Clark
Yes
Gianaris
Yes
Lafayette
No
O'Mara
No
Schimminger
Yes
Arroyo
No
Cole
No
Giglio
Yes
Lancman
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schroeder
No
Aubertine
No
Colton
Yes
Glick
Yes
Latimer
Yes
Parment
Yes
Scozzafava
Yes
Aubry
No
Conte
No
Gordon D
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Paulin
No
Seminerio
No
Bacalles
Yes
Cook
No
Gordon TP
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Peoples
Yes
Spano
No
Ball
No
Crouch
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Peralta
Yes
Stirpe
No
Barclay
Yes
Cusick
No
Greene
No
Lopez PD
No
Perry
Yes
Sweeney
No
Barra
No
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Lopez VJ
Yes
Pheffer
No
Tedisco
Yes
Benedetto
No
DelMonte
No
Hawley
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Powell
No
Thiele
AB
Benjamin
Yes
Destito
No
Hayes
No
Magee
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Titone
Yes
Bing
Yes
Diaz LM
No
Heastie
Yes
Magnarelli
No
Quinn
Yes
Titus
Yes
Boyland
No
Diaz R
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Maisel
No
Rabbitt
No
Tobacco
No
Boyle
Yes
Dinowitz
No
Hikind
No
Markey
No
Raia
Yes
Tonko
Yes
Bradley
No
Duprey
AB
Hooper
Yes
Mayersohn
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Towns
Yes
Brennan
Yes
Eddington
Yes
Hoyt
No
McDonald
No
Reilich
No
Townsend
Yes
Brodsky
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Hyer Spencer
No
McDonough
No
Reilly
No
Walker
AB
Brook Krasny
No
Errigo
Yes
Jacobs
Yes
McEneny
Yes
Rivera J
Yes
Weinstein
No
Burling
Yes
Espaillat
Yes
Jaffee
No
McKevitt
Yes
Rivera N
Yes
Weisenberg
No
Butler
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Jeffries
Yes
Miller
Yes
Rivera PM
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Fields
Yes
John
Yes
Millman
No
Robinson
Yes
Wright
No
Calhoun
No
Finch
Yes
Kavanagh
No
Molinaro
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Young
AB
Camara
No
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kellner
Yes
Morelle
No
Saladino
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Canestrari
No
Gabryszak
No
Kirwan
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Sayward
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A08590 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A8590 SPONSOR: O'Donnell (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to the ability to marry   PURPOSE: This bill provides same-sex couples the same opportunity to enter into civil marriages as opposite-sex couples. The bill also provides that no member of the clergy may be compelled to perform any marriage ceremony.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill sets forth legislative intent. Section 2 of the bill adds a new Section 10-a to the Domestic Relations Law (DRL) providing that: (1) a marriage that is otherwise valid shall be valid regardless of whether the parties to the marriage are of the same or different sex; (2) no government treatment or legal status, effect, right, benefit, privilege, protection or responsibility relating to marriage shall differ based on the parties to the marriage being or having been of the same sex rather than a different sex; and (3) all relevant gender-specific language set forth in or referenced by New York law shall be construed in a gender-neutral manner. Section 3 of the bill amends DRL § 13 to provide that no application for a marriage license shall be denied on the ground that the parties are of the same, or a different, sex. Section 4 of the bill amends DRL § 11(1) to make clear that no member of the clergy acting in such capacity may be required to perform any marriage. Section 5 of the bill sets forth the effective date.   EXISTING LAW: Although the Domestic Relations Law contains no specif- ic prohibition against, or allowance for, marriages between individuals of the same sex, the New York Court of Appeals has held that New York law does not allow for same-sex marriages. See Hernandez v. Robles, 7 N.Y.3d 338 (2005).   STATEMENT IN SUPPORT: The "freedom to marry" is, in the words of the United States Supreme Court, "one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free   people. In New York, however, certain couples who seek to exercise this freedom, and partake of its rights and responsibilities by mutual consent, may not do so solely because they are of the same sex. The bar against same-sex marriages exists regard- less of how long the individuals have lived together, or whether they are raising children through legally-recognized joint custody arrange- ments. This bill removes the barriers in New York law that deprive indi- viduals of the equal right to marry the person of their choice, by granting the same legal recognition to all civil marriages regardless of whether those who enter into them are of the same, or of a different, sex. Partners unable to enter into a civil marriage - and their children -- lack basic legal protections taken for granted by married couples. In such areas as property ownership, inheritance, health care, hospital visitation, taxation, insurance coverage, child custody, pension bene- fits and testimonial privileges, married couples receive important safe- guards against the loss or injury of a spouse, and crucial assurances against legal intrusion into their marital privacy. As important, unions lacking the state's recognition are denoted, by force of law, as somehow not equal to other comparable relationships. Civil marriage is the means by which the state defines a couple's place in society. Those who are excluded from its rubric are told by the institutions of the State, in essence, that their solemn commitment to one another has no legal weight. Just as the right to marry confers important benefits on individuals, the institution of marriage produces incalculable benefits for society, by fostering stable familial relationships. Same-sex couples who wish to marry are not simply looking to obtain additional rights, they are seek- ing out substantial responsibilities as well: to undertake significant and binding obligations to one another, and to lives of "shared intimacy and mutual financial and emotional support Granting legal recognition to these relationships can only strengthen New York's families, by extend- ing the ability to participate in this crucial social institution to all New Yorkers. The history of this country for more than two centuries has been the story of once excluded individuals and groups gaining gradual access to equal rights under law. New York State, in particular, has played a proud and honorable part in that history, from hosting the foundational women's rights convention at Seneca Falls in 1848, to breaking base- ball's color barrier, to witnessing the seminal event of the modem gay rights movement in New York City almost four decades ago. New York legislators and other political leaders, of both parties and of all viewpoints, have had an important role in this process, and in the grad- ual extension of equal treatment to gays and lesbians in particular. In 1983, Governor Mario Cuomo first banned discrimination in state employ- ment by Executive Order. In 2002, Governor Pataki extended the same principle to the private sector by signing into law the Sexual Orien- tation Non-Discrimination Act. That year, the State gave its first legal recognition to same-sex relationships when the Legislature unanimously passed - and the Governor signed - a bill extending workers' compen- sation benefits to all those who lost a partner on 9/11. Yet the insti- tution of marriage remains closed to loving same-sex couples who seek only to be able to show their mutual commitment as other individuals do. Passage of this bill would remedy that flaw, and represent yet another important and historic step in the process by which all citizens of New York State are granted full and equal rights. Individuals on both sides of the questions raised by this bill hold deep-seated views that arise from a host of ethical and religious considerations. To ensure that the bill does not improperly intrude into matters of conscience or religious belief, the bill affirms that no member of the clergy can be compelled to solemnize any marriage. In short, this bill grants equal access to the government-created legal institution of civil marriage, while leaving the religious institution of marriage to its own separate, and fully autonomous, sphere.   BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: The bill will require additional state expenditures for spousal benefits for those partners of state employees who are not eligible for such benefits under current law The budgetary impact, however, will be offset to the extent same-sex couples enjoy such benefits through a variety of administrative schemes. In particular, the Department of Civil Service already offers most state employees health and other insurance benefits for their domestic partners. Certain municipalities, including New York City, offer similar access to benefits.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill takes effect immediately.
A08590 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 8590 2007-2008 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY May 21, 2007 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. O'DONNELL, GOTTFRIED, GLICK, HOYT, WRIGHT, HEVE- SI, KAVANAGH, V. LOPEZ, LIFTON, BING, PAULIN, MILLMAN, N. RIVERA, ROSENTHAL, ALESSI, J. RIVERA, BENEDETTO, BRODSKY, ORTIZ, CAHILL, COOK, DINOWITZ, L. DIAZ, EDDINGTON, JEFFRIES, SAYWARD, JOHN, BRENNAN, FIELDS, JAFFEE, LAFAYETTE, PERALTA, LANCMAN, LAVINE, WEPRIN, ZEBROWSKI K, TITONE -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. AUBRY, BOYLAND, BRADLEY, ENGLEBRIGHT, FARRELL, LATIMER, LUPARDO, McENENY, NOLAN, PRETLOW, RAMOS, SCHIMEL, SWEENEY, TOWNS, WEISENBERG, YOUNG -- (at request of the Governor) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Judiciary AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to the ability to marry The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Legislative intent. Marriage is a fundamental human right. 2 Same-sex couples and their children should have the same access as 3 others to the protections, responsibilities, rights, obligations, and 4 benefits of civil marriage. Stable family relationships help build a 5 stronger society. For the welfare of the community and in fairness to 6 all New Yorkers, this act formally recognizes otherwise-valid marriages 7 without regard to whether the parties are of the same or different sex. 8 It is the intent of the legislature that the marriages of same-sex and 9 different-sex couples be treated equally in all respects under the law. 10 The omission from this act of changes to other provisions of law shall 11 not be construed as a legislative intent to preserve any legal 12 distinction between same-sex couples and different-sex couples with 13 respect to marriage. The legislature intends that all provisions of law 14 which utilize gender-specific terms in reference to the parties to a 15 marriage, or which in any other way may be inconsistent with this act, 16 be construed in a gender-neutral manner or in any way necessary to 17 effectuate the intent of this act. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD12030-02-7A. 8590 2 1 § 2. The domestic relations law is amended by adding a new section 2 10-a to read as follows: 3 § 10-a. Sex of parties. 1. A marriage that is otherwise valid shall be 4 valid regardless of whether the parties to the marriage are of the same 5 or different sex. 6 2. No government treatment or legal status, effect, right, benefit, 7 privilege, protection or responsibility relating to marriage, whether 8 deriving from statute, administrative or court rule, public policy, 9 common law or any other source of law, shall differ based on the parties 10 to the marriage being or having been of the same sex rather than a 11 different sex. When necessary to implement the rights and responsibil- 12 ities of spouses under the law, all gender-specific language or terms 13 shall be construed in a gender-neutral manner in all such sources of 14 law. 15 § 3. Section 13 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 16 720 of the laws of 1957, is amended to read as follows: 17 § 13. Marriage licenses. It shall be necessary for all persons 18 intended to be married in New York state to obtain a marriage license 19 from a town or city clerk in New York state and to deliver said license, 20 within sixty days, to the clergyman or magistrate who is to officiate 21 before the marriage ceremony may be performed. In case of a marriage 22 contracted pursuant to subdivision four of section eleven of this chap- 23 ter, such license shall be delivered to the judge of the court of record 24 before whom the acknowledgment is to be taken. If either party to the 25 marriage resides upon an island located not less than twenty-five miles 26 from the office or residence of the town clerk of the town of which such 27 island is a part, and if such office or residence is not on such island 28 such license may be obtained from any justice of the peace residing on 29 such island, and such justice, in respect to powers and duties relating 30 to marriage licenses, shall be subject to the provisions of this article 31 governing town clerks and shall file all statements or affidavits 32 received by him while acting under the provisions of this section with 33 the town clerk of such town. No application for a marriage license shall 34 be denied on the ground that the parties are of the same, or a differ- 35 ent, sex. 36 § 4. Subdivision 1 of section 11 of the domestic relations law, as 37 amended by chapter 319 of the laws of 1959, is amended to read as 38 follows: 39 1. A clergyman or minister of any religion, or by the senior leader, 40 or any of the other leaders, of The Society for Ethical Culture in the 41 city of New York, having its principal office in the borough of Manhat- 42 tan, or by the leader of The Brooklyn Society for Ethical Culture, 43 having its principal office in the borough of Brooklyn of the city of 44 New York, or of the Westchester Ethical Society, having its principal 45 office in Westchester county, or of the Ethical Culture Society of Long 46 Island, having its principal office in Nassau county, or of the River- 47 dale-Yonkers Ethical Society having its principal office in Bronx coun- 48 ty, or by the leader of any other Ethical Culture Society affiliated 49 with the American Ethical Union; provided that no clergyman, minister or 50 Society for Ethical Culture leader shall be required to solemnize any 51 marriage when acting in his or her capacity under this subdivision. 52 § 5. This act shall take effect immediately.