•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A09230 Summary:

BILL NOA09230A
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORWallace
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§675 & 679, rpld & add §678, Bank L
 
Provides for multiple-person accounts; requires a signature card; provides that absent indication to the contrary, funds remaining in such an account upon the death of the depositor shall be deemed part of the depositor's estate.
Go to top

A09230 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A9230A
 
SPONSOR: Wallace
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the banking law, in relation to establishing multiple- person accounts; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This bill seeks to reform sections of the Banking Law governing joint accounts, as existing law has harmed account owners and burdened the court system with related litigation. It establishes multiple-person accounts governed by contemporary best practices to align the law with account owners' expectations and creates an account signature card to promote fair and reasonable outcomes.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1. Adds a new Section 675 (d) to the banking law. *This limits scope of Section 675 of the banking law so it will not apply to accounts established for personal use. Section 2. Repeals and replaces section 678 of the banking law. Subdivision 1. Definitions Subdivision 2. Scope of section. *This section applies to multiple-person and single-owner accounts in NYS established for personal use. *This section does not affect the law governing business accounts and fiduciary or trust accounts established outside the terms of the bank account. Subdivision 3. Types of Accounts. *A bank may establish a multiple-person account, with or without the right of survivorship, and with or without one or more authorized signer designations. Subdivision 4. Administration of account signature card. *The account signature card establishes the account type and terms and must be administered by the bank upon opening or modifying the terms of an account. All owners must agree to modification in writing. *If not administered by a bank, the account signature card must be nota- rized. *If filed electronically, the account signature card must be submitted in compliance with executive law Section 135(C) and the state technology law. *Bank must keep the account signature card for 6 years after an account is closed. Subdivision 5. Designation of authorized signer. *An account owner may add an authorized signer to an account, but if there is more than one account owner, all owners must agree in writing on the form. *An authorized signer's authority to make transaction for the conven- ience of account owner(s) survives disability or incapacity unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a different intent. *Death of sole or last account owner ends authorized signer's authority. Subdivision 6. Account ownership during lifetime. *In a multiple-owner account, account funds belong to account owners in proportion to their net contribution (deposits minus withdrawals). In the absence of evidence, net contributions are presumed to be equal. *Authorized signers have no beneficial right to account funds. Subdivi- sion 7. Rights at death. *Rights at the death of an account owner are determined by the terms of the account at the time of the account owner's death. *Transfers resulting under section are effective based on the terms of the account and not subject to probate. *If account owners have not chosen survivorship on the account signature card, or there is clear and convincing evidence that survivorship was not intended, account funds will be disposed of as part of a deceased account owner's estate. *If account owners have chosen survivorship on the account signature card, or there is clear and convincing evidence that survivorship was intended, then a deceased account owner's funds shall pass equally among surviving account owners. *The ownership rights of a surviving account owner and the deceased owner's estate are subject to payment requests made by the account owner before death. *Regardless of payment status (before or after death), the surviving account owners are liable for unpaid requests, limited to a propor- tionate share of the transferred amount under this section. Subdivision 8. Alteration of rights. *An account owner can alter the terms of the account by completing a new account signature card. *Survivorship rights may not be altered by will. *If there is more than one account owner, all owners must consent to the alteration in writing using the account signature card. Subdivision 9. Payment on multiple-owner accounts. *Upon request, a bank may pay account funds in a multiple-owner account to: - Account owner(s), irrespective of disability, incapacity, or death. The personal representative of a deceased account owner, or if there is none, according to the surrogate's court procedure act, if proof of death confirms the deceased was the survivor of all other account owners, excluding accounts without the right of survivorship. Subdivision 10. Payment to authorized signer. *A bank may pay account funds to an authorized signer regardless of the disability, incapacity, or death of an account owner when the request is made. Subdivision 11. Discharge from liability. *Payment made pursuant to the section complying with the terms of the account and account signature card discharges the bank from all claims for amounts paid, irrespective of beneficial account ownership. Payment can occur regardless of the disability, incapacity, or death of an account owner, beneficiary, or authorized signer. *Protection does not cover payments made after the bank receives written notice preventing such payments, provided the bank has had a reasonable chance to act. The protection continues unless the notice is withdrawn, or successors of the deceased account owners agree on a request for payment. *In case of a dispute between account owners, the bank may refuse, with- out liability, to make payments. The bank is not obligated to inquire about the source of a deposit or application of a payment. *Bank protection under this section does not affect the rights of account owners in disputes among themselves or their successors regard- ing ownership of account funds or payments made from accounts. *Beneficial account ownership applies only to controversies between account owners and their creditors or other successors. It does not affect a bank's ability to make payments as per the terms of the account. Subdivision 12. Existing accounts. *Banks must notify the owners of multiple-person accounts established before the effective date of this section about the requirement to submit an account signature card within one year from the effective date of this act. The notice must include the account signature card. *The notice can be executed by mail or electronically. *If the bank has not received an account signature card from an account owner within 6 months, it must provide a second notice. Subdivision 13. Regulations of the superintendent. *The Dept. of Financial Services may make rules and regulations govern- ing multiple-person accounts. Subdivision 14. Severability clause *If any provision of this act is invalid, it shall not affect other provisions that can be given effect without the invalid provision. Section 3. Amends Section 679 of the banking law. *Replaces reference to convenience account with reference to multiple- person account. Section 4. Effective date shall be 180 days after this bill shall have become a law.   JUSTIFICATION: Written in 1965, Section 675 of the Banking Law provides for joint accounts, or accounts owned by more than one person by joint tenancy. Our surrogacy judges are calling for reform of this section, as it has caused extensive litigation due to the antiquated moiety rule, a lack of clear ownership delineation, and an overreliance on the presumption of survivorship. First, the moiety rule is an antiquated doctrine; it presumes that upon creating or depositing funds into a joint account, half of the funds constitute an irrevocable gift to the other joint owner. This presents the following problems: joint owners rarely intend a change of benefi- cial ownership upon establishing an account or making a deposit; a judgement against one joint owner can unfairly entangle the others; and unfair withdrawals by one joint owner can leave others without recourse beyond their moiety. Second, banks are failing to clearly delineate joint account ownership. Joint accounts with a right of survivorship are a will substitute, mean- ing that the terms of the account govern the disposition of account funds over a will or the laws of intestacy. In some cases, an agent named on a joint account is erroneously classified as a joint owner so that the account funds pass to such agent over rightful beneficiaries, heirs, or devisees. Senior citizens and the developmentally disabled are most at risk, as they must frequently appoint agents to make trans- actions for their convenience. Third, overreliance on the presumption of survivorship has caused irre- parable harm to many. joint owners. This presumption dictates that if a joint owner dies, the account funds will pass to the surviving joint owner(s). Once the funds pass, they are frequently unable to be recov- ered, such that if they vest in an incorrect person, there is no remedy. This problem is compounded by the previously described lack of clear ownership delineation. This bill recognizes that an account owner may add another person to an account for various reasons. The account owner may intend to share life- time ownership of the account with more than one person, to pass account funds to another person upon her death, or simply to enable account transactions by a third person as a convenience without granting owner- ship or survivorship rights. Joint accounts under existing law do not adequately allow account owners to distinguish among these different functions. Moreover, the account owner's use of an account for one purpose may yield unwanted conse- quences for other purposes. By contrast, this bill provides account owners the flexibility to choose the type of account that best suits their purposes and the tools to do so unambiguously. This bill limits Banking Law Section 675 so that it shall not capture accounts created for personal use. It replaces section 678 with new rules for accounts created for personal use. The new language in Section 678 was largely adopted from the Uniform Probate Code and Uniform Multiple Party Accounts Act. It would replace joint accounts with multiple-person accounts, addressing the problems with the former. First, this bill revokes the moiety rule for personal accounts. Account funds belong to account owners during their lifetimes according to each account owner's net contribution to the account, creating a tenancy in common during life. No intention to make a gift is imputed from opening an account in multiple names or from making an additional deposit to an account. Second, this bill clearly delineates ownership in multiple-person accounts. This bill statutorily requires banks to provide their depos- itors with an account signature card written in accessible language and containing simple instructions to both the financial institution and account owner(s) to unambiguously set the terms of an account. The account signature card provides for accounts that may be owned by a single owner or multiple owners, may include one or more authorized signer (agency) designations, and may be with or without the right of survivorship. Thus, the signature card clarifies the relationships and rights among the various persons involved with an account. Third, this bill does not rely on presumptions. Although it presumes that account funds will pass to a deceased account owner's estate, the mandatory account signature card allows an account owner to plainly state how her estate will pass while alive. This greatly reduces the risk that account funds will be irreparably lost while still allowing courts to overturn unintended, erroneous or predatory arrangements with clear and convincing evidence. This bill addresses the shortcomings of Banking Law Section 675, making comprehensive reforms to the outdated moiety rule, poor ownership delin- eation, and overreliance on the presumption of survivorship. By intro- ducing modern best practices and requiring the administration of account signature cards, this bill ensures that account owners can make informed decisions that will be carried out as intended. These changes aim to align the law with the expectations of account owners, providing a framework that is fair and reasonable.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: None   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law.
Go to top