A09415 Summary:
BILL NO | A09415A |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S08658-A |
  | |
SPONSOR | Mamdani (MS) |
  | |
COSPNSR | |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | Bichotte Hermelyn, Davila, Forrest, Gallagher, Gonzalez-Rojas, Mitaynes, Septimo, Shrestha |
  | |
Add §1266-n, Pub Auth L | |
  | |
Enacts the "get congestion pricing right act"; directs the MTA to allocate $45 million to the MTA's bus system to increase frequency and reliability; directs the MTA to allocate $45 million to expand the fare-free bus pilot program within NYC; requires reporting on such investments. |
A09415 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A9415A SPONSOR: Mamdani (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the public authorities law, in relation to enacting the "get congestion pricing right act"   PURPOSE: To improve the Metropolitan Transportation Authority bus system in anticipation of congestion pricing.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 sets the short title to be the "Get Congestion Pricing Right" Act. § 2 provides the legislative findings and intent. § 3 amends the public authorities law by adding a new section 1266-n. Subsection 1 provides $45,000,000 to the bus system to increase frequen- cy and reliability of buses. The section includes parameters for route selections, including that routes chosen must have capacity for more frequency absent infrastruc- ture changes. This section also includes reporting requirements upon receipt Of funding. Subsection 2 expands the fare free bus program to 15 new lines (three per borough) for one year, for a total of $45,000,000. The section specifies that the MTA must select routes according to: (a) service adequacy and equity for low-income and economically disadvan- taged communities and (b) access to employment and commercial activity in areas served by the fare-free routes. Each route selected must also meet a threshold of 20,000 daily riders at minimum. The section also includes reporting requirements upon receipt of fund- ing; survey requirements including quality of life questions and varied survey methods; a requirement to implement all-door boarding; and promo- tional requirements. § 4 relates to the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Ahead of congestion pricing's roll-out, we need to transform public transit, and better bus service is the key to getting congestion pricing right. Buses enable riders who live far from the subway to get to Manhattan and facilitate crosstown and inter-borough travel. Buses also need more investment if they are to attract more riders: - crawling at 8 mph on of bus riders are Moreover, improving buses was central to the successful implementation of congestion pricing elsewhere. Before London started congestion pric- ing, it increased bus service by 17% (4). As a result, congestion was reduced by 30% and bus travel in central London increased by 33% (5). This is also true in Stockholm, where expanded bus service led to congestion pricing success: traffic was reduced by 22% and public senti- ment towards the policy skyrocketed (6). We want to see these same results in NYC, but need to chart them now, through this legislation. Firstly, this bill allocates $45 million to increase bus service frequency and reliability, along with stipulations for route selection and reporting requirements. Secondly, the legis- lation allocates $45 million to expand the fare-free bus pilot, bringing three routes to each borough. These bus service investments will attract new riders - and increase ridership for the long term - making congestion pricing a success.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New Bill   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: $90 million cost to the State   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately. (1)https://www.nvtimes.com/2023/08/17/nvrection/eric-adams-buses- nyc.html?searchResultPosition=1 (2) https://www.amny.com/transit/nyc-buses-running-slowest-speeds -since-2019/ :-:text=Buses%20run%2Obv%20the%20MTA,8.3%20mph%20t he%20year%20before. (3) https://new.mta.info/document/115376 (4)https://www.vice.com/en/article/dv343v/new-vork-city-is-about -to-screw-up-congestion-pricing (5) Iattps://www.intelligenttransport.com/transport-news/143883/10 ndons-congestion-charge-celebrates-20-vears-of-success/ (6) https://www.sfcta.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Concrestion% 20Pricing%20Case%20Studies%20200213%20-%20Stockholm.pdf MTA buses areth- eslowest in the nation(1) average(2)-andthey aren't reliable:38% dissa- tisfiedwithservice reliability(3).
A09415 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 9415--A IN ASSEMBLY March 14, 2024 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. MAMDANI -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. BICHOTTE HERMELYN, DAVILA, FORREST, GALLAGHER, GONZALEZ-ROJAS, MITAYNES, SEPTIMO, SHRESTHA -- read once and referred to the Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the public authorities law, in relation to enacting the "get congestion pricing right act" The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as 2 the "get congestion pricing right act". 3 § 2. Legislative findings and intent. The legislature hereby finds and 4 declares the importance of the New York Metropolitan Transportation 5 Authority (MTA) and affirms the duty of the legislature to ensure that 6 the MTA operates effectively. The MTA provides an essential service: 7 transporting millions of New Yorkers on billions of trips each year to 8 and from their places of work, worship, and gathering. The legislature 9 further finds that, as the MTA moves to implement congestion pricing, 10 the MTA must also encourage the use of public transit as an alternative 11 by providing more frequent, reliable, and affordable service - partic- 12 ularly bus service. The legislature finds that bus system investments 13 were at the core of London's successful congestion pricing implementa- 14 tion and declares that New York must follow suit by investing in its own 15 bus service prior to the implementation of congestion pricing to better 16 serve riders and attract riders for the long-term. 17 § 3. The public authorities law is amended by adding a new section 18 1266-n to read as follows: 19 § 1266-n. Bus service frequency and reliability and fare-free bus 20 expansion. 1. The authority shall allocate forty-five million dollars in 21 state funds received to the authority's bus system to increase frequency 22 and reliability. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD14661-03-4A. 9415--A 2 1 (a) Upon receipt of such funding the authority shall evaluate target- 2 ing such investments according, but not limited, to increasing the reli- 3 ability, frequency, and speed of the following: 4 (i) feeder routes to subway stations; 5 (ii) express buses into the central business district; 6 (iii) buses that are chronically over capacity; and 7 (iv) local and select buses. 8 (b) Routes chosen shall have capacity for more frequency absent 9 infrastructure changes and priority shall be given to increasing service 10 on the lines that are part of the fare-free bus pilot program. 11 (c) The authority shall report on its route decisions in an initial 12 public report prior to the launch of such investments. The authority 13 shall also report an evaluation of frequency and reliability outcomes of 14 each selected route via two reports. The first such report shall be 15 completed no later than December thirty-first, two thousand twenty-four, 16 and the second such report shall be completed no later than one year 17 after the launch of such investments. Such outcome reports shall also 18 include cost and schedule projections for each route funded by such 19 increase. 20 (d) Such investments shall be implemented by the first day of 21 congestion pricing's implementation. 22 2. The authority shall allocate forty-five million dollars in state 23 funds received to expand the fare-free bus pilot program within the city 24 of New York. 25 (a) The fare-free bus pilot program expansion shall last for one year. 26 (b) The fare-free bus pilot program expansion shall consist of at 27 least fifteen new fare-free bus routes and shall cost no more than 28 forty-five million dollars in net operating costs. Net operating costs 29 shall be determined by the total costs of implementing the fare-free bus 30 pilot program expansion and shall not accrue to the city of New York. 31 (c) The fare-free bus routes included in the fare-free bus pilot 32 program expansion shall be selected by the authority, and may include 33 either New York City Transit Authority or MTA bus routes, provided that 34 there shall be at least three new fare-free bus routes within each of 35 the following counties: Kings county, New York county, Queens county, 36 Richmond county, and Bronx county. 37 (d) The factors considered by the authority in selecting such fare- 38 free bus routes shall include but not be limited to: 39 (i) service adequacy and equity for low-income and economically disad- 40 vantaged communities; and 41 (ii) access to employment and commercial activity in areas served by 42 such fare-free routes. 43 (e) Each route selected shall meet a minimum threshold of twenty thou- 44 sand daily riders. 45 (f) The authority shall report to its board on the fare-free bus pilot 46 program expansion after it has been in effect for three months, six 47 months, and again upon the conclusion of the fare-free bus pilot program 48 expansion. Such reports shall also be sent to the governor and every 49 member of the state legislature and shall include, but not be limited 50 to, the following comparative performance metrics: 51 (i) ridership totals relative to equivalent time periods before the 52 fare-free bus pilot program expansion took effect; 53 (ii) percent of scheduled service delivered; 54 (iii) average end-to-end bus speed changes; 55 (iv) customer journey time performance; 56 (v) additional bus stop time and travel time;A. 9415--A 3 1 (vi) wait assessments; 2 (vii) the cost to provide such service itemized by route; and 3 (viii) scheduled service frequency. 4 (g) The authority shall also survey riders on the fare-free routes at 5 the three-, six- and twelve-month marks on topics including but not 6 limited to: 7 (i) overall rider satisfaction; 8 (ii) real and perceived economic benefit experienced by riders, 9 including economic savings; 10 (iii) experience of security and safety when riding the fare-free bus; 11 and 12 (vi) general demographic information including annual income, vehicle 13 access, race and ethnicity, disability status, age, and enrollment 14 status in discount program. The authority shall also include questions 15 from the UMKC Center for Economic Information survey research of the 16 Kansas City Area Transportation Authority's (KCATA/RideKC) ZeroFare 17 program quality-of-life effects. Survey methods shall include in-person, 18 phone and online. 19 (h) The authority shall implement all-door boarding on all fare-free 20 buses beginning the first day of the fare-free bus pilot program expan- 21 sion. 22 (i) The authority shall promote the fare-free routes through the 23 following methods at a minimum: signage on buses, signage at bus stops, 24 intersecting subway stops, announcement on the authority "fares & tolls" 25 webpage, digital advertisements on subways, and across MTA social media 26 accounts. Any messaging promoting the fare-free routes shall also 27 include messaging reminding riders that such program is on select routes 28 and that such riders should treat their bus operators with respect and 29 decorum. 30 (j) The authority shall present the fare-free bus pilot program expan- 31 sion to its board for approval no later than sixty days after the effec- 32 tive date of this section, for implementation no later than ninety days 33 after board adoption. 34 § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.