•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A02538 Summary:

BILL NOA02538A
 
SAME ASSAME AS S07754-A
 
SPONSORDavila
 
COSPNSRCunningham, Lee
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §95, Soc Serv L
 
Provides that applicants for or recipients of SNAP benefits shall not be subjected to finger imaging as a requirement of the supplemental nutrition assistance program.
Go to top

A02538 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A2538A
 
SPONSOR: Davila
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the social services law, in relation to finger imaging for SNAP benefit recipients   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The purpose of this bill is to eliminate the finger imaging matching identification system for applicants or recipients of food stamp program.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Amends subdivision 3 of section 95 of the social services law, by adding a new paragraph (d).   JUSTIFICATION: Finger imaging requirements in the Food Stamp Program (also known as SNAP Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have proven to decrease participation in this vital program while imposing an unnecessary admin- istrative burden on the government. Prior to 2012, New York was one of the only two states that required fingerprinting of Food Stamp appli- cants and recipients. At that time, 3o% of New Yorkers who were eligible for the program did not participate. Studies at that time demonstrated that this policy resulted in the denial of needed benefits to eligible households, often for months, while failing to reduce fraud. Since 2012, it has been a policy of the state to simplify the application process and remove this barrier, which perpetuated a negative stigma and kept food off the table for those in need. The Office of Temporary and Disa- bility Assistance (OTDA) put in place a new statewide system for deter- mining Food and Stamp eligibility that, along with federal requirements, prevents duplicate participation in a less costly and more effective manner. By 2015, participation increased significantly, with 87% of eligible individuals participating in the Food Stamp Program. Given this success, codification in state law is appropriate.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2023-2024: A. 9594 2021-2022:A.2367 2019-2020:A.4180; 2017-2018:A.3044; 2015-2016:A.1489; 2013-2014:A.2666; 2011-2012:A.5303-A; 2009-10: A.1681; 2008-2009: A.10215;   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: No new fiscal implications.   EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1, 2026
Go to top